Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-xkcpr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:50:19.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Genus Anguillulina Gerv. & v. Ben., 1859, vel Tylenchus Bastian, 1865

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. Goodey
T. Goodey
Affiliation:
(Principal Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of the present paper is to bring together brief descriptions of the various species of the genus Anguillulina, more generally known under the synonymous generic name of Tylenchus Bastian, 1865. In the case of the plant-parasitic species, in addition to particulars on dimensions and morphology, data are given on life-history, hosts and geographical distribution; such matters as symptoms, pathology and methods of control are not dealt with.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 10 , Issue 2-3 , June 1932 , pp. 75 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Amos, A., 1919.—The Difficulties of Growing Red Clover, Stem Sickness and other Causes of failure, J. R. Agric. Soc., LXXIX, 68–88.Google Scholar
1a.Bally, W., & Reydon, G. A., 1931.—De Tegenwoordige Stand van net Vraagstuk van de Woortelaaltjes in de Koffiecultuur, Archief voor de Koffiecultuur, v, (2-3), 23–216. (English Summary.) Batavia.Google Scholar
2.Bastian, C. H., 1865.—Monograph on the Anguillulidae, Trans. Linn. Soc., xxv, 73–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bauer, F., 1923.—Microscopical Observations on the Suspension of Muscular Motions of Vibrio tritici, Philos. Trans., cxiii, (8), 1, 16.Google Scholar
4.Baylis, H. A., & Daubney, R., 1926.—A Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Nematoda. London.Google Scholar
5.Bejerinck, M. W., 1883.—De oorzaak der kroefziekte van de jonge ajuin-planten, Maandblad uitgegeven van wege de Hollandsche maatschappij van Landbouw, v.Google Scholar
6.Bessey, E. A., 1905.—A Nematode Disease of Grasses, Science, xxi, N.S. (532), 391–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bos, J. Ritzema, 1888–1892.—L'Anguillule de la Tige (Tylenchus devastatrix Kühn) et les maladies des plantes dues à ce Nématode, Arch. Mus. Teyler, III, sr. (2-3), 161–348 and 545–588.Google Scholar
7a.Bovien, P., 1929.—Ueber das Vorkommen von Tylenchus pratensis de Man, in Dänemark, Anzeiger f. Schädlingskunde, Jhg. v, (5), 61–2.Google Scholar
8.Butler, E. J., 1913.—Diseases of Rice, I.—An Eelworm Disease of Rice. Bull, 34, Agric. Res. Inst. Pusa, India.Google Scholar
9.Butler, E. J., 1919.—The Rice Worm (Tylenchus angustus) and its Control, Mem. Dept. Agric. India Bot. Ser., x, (1).Google Scholar
10.Bütschli, O., 1873.—Beiträge zur Kenntniss der freilebenden Nematoden. Nova Acta Ksl. Leop.-Carol. Deittsch. Akad. Naturf., xxxvi, (5).Google Scholar
10a.Bütschli, O., 1876.—Studien äber die ersten Entwicklungs-vorgänge der Eizelle, die Zelltheihmg und die Conjugation der Infusorien, Abh. senckenb. naturf. Ges. x (3 & 4), 213–464, Frankfurt-a-M.Google Scholar
11.Byars, L. P., 1920.—The Nematode Disease of Wheat caused by Tylenchus tritici, U.S. Dept. Agric., Bull, 842.Google Scholar
12.Cassidy, G., 1930.—Nematodes Associated with Sugar Cane in Hawaii. Hawaii. Plant. Rec., xxxiv, (4), 379–387.Google Scholar
12a.Cassidy, G., 1930 a.—J. Parasit., xvi, 162.Google Scholar
13.Cobb, N. A., 1890.—Tylenchus and Root-gall, Agric. Gaz., N.S.W., I, 155–184.Google Scholar
13a.Cobb, N. A., 1891.—Strawberry Bunch, Agric. Gaz., N.S.W., II.Google Scholar
14.Cobb, N. A. 1893.—Nematodes, Mostly Australian and Fijian, Dept. Agric., N.S.W. Misc. Pub. 13 (reprint from Macleay Mem. Vol. Linn. Soc., N.S.W.)Google Scholar
15.Cobb, N. A. 1893 a.—Plant Diseases and their Remedies. Nematode Worms found attacking Sugar-Cane, Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., iv, (10).Google Scholar
16.Cobb, N. A. 1906.—Fungus Maladies of the Sugar Cane—With Notes on Associated Insects and Nematodes, Yearbook & Expt. Stat. Rep. Hawaii. Sugar Plant Ass., Bull, 5, 1–254.Google Scholar
17.Cobb, N. A. 1909.—Fungus Maladies of the Sugar Cane, Hawaii. Sugar Plant. Ass. Expt. Stat., Bull, 6, 63–73.Google Scholar
18.Cobb, N. A. 1913.—New Nematode Genera found inhabiting Fresh Water and Non-Brackish Soils, J. Wash. Acad. Sci., III, (16), 432–444.Google Scholar
19.Cobb, N. A. 1914.—North American Free-Living Fresh-Water Nematodes, Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc., xxxiii, 35–99.Google Scholar
20.Cobb, N. A. 1915.—Tylenchus similis, the cause of a Root Disease of Sugar Cane and Banana, J. Agric. Res., iv, (6), 561–568.Google Scholar
21.Cobb, N. A. 1917.—A New Parasitic Nema found infesting Cotton and Potatoes, J. Agric. Res., xi, (1), 27–33.Google Scholar
22.Cobb, N. A. 1919.—A New Nema, Tylenchus musicola n. sp., said to Cause a Serious Affection of the Bluggoe Banana in Grenada, British West Indies, W. Ind. Bull, xvii, (3), 179–182.Google Scholar
23.Cobb, N. A. 1920.—One Hundred New Nemas, Contr. Sci. Nematology, ix. Baltimore.Google Scholar
24.Cobb, N. A. 1920 a.—A Newly Discovered Parasitic Nematode, Tylenchus mahogani n. sp., connected with a Disease of the Mahogany Tree, J. Parasit., vi, (4), 188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Cobb, N. A. 1922.—Two Tree-Infesting Nemas of the genus Tylenchus, An. Zool. aplic., ix, 27–35. Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
26.Cobb, N. A. 1925.—Biological Relationships of the Mathematical Series 1, 2, 4, etc., with a Description of a New Nema, Tylenchus cancellatus, Contr. Sci. Nematology, XV.Google Scholar
27.Cobb, N. A. 1930.—In ‘ The African Republic of Liberia and Belgian Congo, Harvard African Expedition, 1926–1927,’ I, 487–489. London.Google Scholar
28.Cotte, J., 1912.—Recherches sur les galles de Provence, Bull. Soc. philom. Paris, ser. 10, iv, (3), 256–7.Google Scholar
29.Cotte, J., 1920.—Deux Parasites de la Figue sauvage, Bull. Soc. path. vég. Fr., vii, (1), 26–30.Google Scholar
30.Davaine, C., 1857.—Recherches sur l'Anguillule du Blé Niellé, etc. Paris.Google Scholar
31.Debray, F., & Maupas, E., 1896.—Le Tylenchus devastatriz Kühn et la maladie vermiculaire des Fèves en Algerie, L'Algerie agricole.Google Scholar
32.Diesing, C. M., 1851.—Systema Helminthum, II.Google Scholar
33.Eriksson, J., 1885.—Bidrag till kännedomen om vara odlade växters sjudkomar I, Rot-gallbildningar hos korn, K. LandbrAkad. Handl. Stockh., iv., 12–19.Google Scholar
34.Gervais, P., & Beneden, P. J. Van, 1859.—Zoologie Médicale. T., ii.Google Scholar
35.Godfrey, G. H., 1923.—The Eelworm; A Menace to Alfalfa in America, U.S. Depi. Agric. Dept. Circ., 297.Google Scholar
36.Godfrey, G. H., 1924.—Dissemination of the Stem and Bulb Infesting Nematode, Tylenchus dipsaci, in the Seeds of Certain Composites, J. Agric. Res., xxviii, (5), 473–478.Google Scholar
37.Godfrey, G. H., 1929.—A Destructive Root Disease of Pine Apples and other Plants due to Tylenchus brachyurus n. sp., Phytopathology, xix, (7), 611–629.Google Scholar
38.Godfrey, G. H., 1931.—The Host Plants of the “ Burrowing Nematode,” Tylenchus similis, Phytopathology, xxi, (3), 315–322.Google Scholar
39.Godfrey, G. H., & McKay, M. B., 1924.—The Stem Nematode, Tylenchus dipsaci on Wild Hosts in the North West, U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull, 1229.Google Scholar
40.Goffart, H., 1929.—Beobachtungen über Anguillulina pratensis de Man, Z. Parasitknd., II, (1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Goodey, T., 1922.—On the Susceptibility of Clover and some other Legumes to Stem Disease caused by the Eelworm, Tylenchus dipsaci syn. devastatrix Kühn, J. Agric. Sci., xii, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Goodey, T., 1923.—Eelworm Disease of Potatoes caused by Tylenchus dipsaci, J. Helm., I, 197–204.Google Scholar
43.Goodey, T., 1925.—Tylenchus hordei Schøyen, a Nematode Parasite causing Galls on the Roots of Barley and other Gramineæ, J. Helm., III, (5), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Goodey, T., 1927.—On Tylenchus graminis (Hardy, 1850) Marcinowski, 1909, J. Helm., v, (3), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Goodey, T., 1928.—Observations on Tylenchus musicola Cobb, 1919, from Diseased Banana Roots., J. Helm., vi, (4), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45a.Goodey, T., 1929b.—A Note on the identity of the nematode genera Anguillulina and Tylenchus, J. Helm., vii (3), 141–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Goodey, T., 1929.—The Stem Eelworm, Tylenchus dipsaci (Kühn, 1858): Obser- vations on Its Attacks on Potatoes and Mangolds with a Host-List of Plants Parasitized by It, J. Helm., VII, (4), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46a.Goodey, T., 1929a.—On Some New and Little-known Free-living Nematodes, J. Helm., vii, (1), 1–14.Google Scholar
47.Goodey, T., 1930.—On Tylenchus agrostis (Steinbuch, 1799), J. Helm., viii. (4), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Goodey, T., 1932.—On the Nomenclature of the Root-gall Nematodes, J. Helm., x, (1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Goodey, T., 1932a.—Some Observations on the Biology of the Root-gall Nematode Anguillulina radicicola (Greeff, 1872). J. Helm., x (1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50.Greeff, R., 1864.—Verh. naiurh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl., xxi, 112–113.Google Scholar
51.Greeff, R., 1872.—Über Nematoden in Wurzelanschwellungen (Gallen) verschiedener Pflanzen, SitzBer. Ges. ges. Naiurw. Marburg, 168–174.Google Scholar
52.Haan, J. Van Breda De, 1902.—Een Aaltjes-Ziekte der Rijst, “ Omo Mentek” of “ Omo Bambang,” Meded. PITuin. Batavia, LIII.Google Scholar
53.Hardy, J., 1850.—On the Effects produced by some Insects, etc, on Plants. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., vi, ser. 2, 182–3.Google Scholar
54.Havenstein, , 1880.—Die Wurm-oder Stockkrankheit, ihre Verbreitung und Bekämpfung. Bonn.Google Scholar
55.Henning, E., 1898.—De vigtigaste a kulturväxterna förekommende nematoderna, Handl. Landbr., xxxvii, 247.Google Scholar
56.Hodson, W. E. H., 1926.—Observations on the Biology of Tylenchus dipsaci (Kuhn) Bastian, and the Occurrence of Biologic Strains of the Nematode, Ann. Appl. Biol., XIII, (2-3), 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57.Hodson, W. E. H., 1929.—The Occurrence of Tylenchus dipsaci (Kuhn) in Wild Host Plants in South-west England, J. Helm., vii, (3), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58.Hodson, W. E. H., 1931.—The Stem and Bulb Eelworm, Tylenchus dipsaci (Kuhn) Bastian: A Further Contribution to our Knowledge of the Biologic Strains of the Nematode, Ann. Appl. Biol., xviii, (1). 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59.Horn, P., 1888.—Die Aelchen-Gallen auf Phleum Boehmeri Wibel, Arch. Fr. Naturg. Mecklenb., LXII, 139–156, Pub. 1889. Güstrow.Google Scholar
60.Imamura, S., 1931.—Nematodes in the Paddy Field, with Notes on their Population before and after Irrigation, J. Coll. Agric. Tokyo, xi, (2-3), 193–240.Google Scholar
61.Jack, H. W., 1923.—Rice in Malay, Malayan Agric. J., xi, (5 and 6), 103–109 and 139–161.Google Scholar
62.Kamrodt, , 1867.—Z. landw. Ver. Rheinpreuss, vi, 251–378.Google Scholar
63.Kemner, N. A., 1930.—Några iakttagelser över Kornnematoden, Tylenchus hordei Scheyen, i Sverige, Medd. CentAnst. Forsokv. Jordbr. Stockh., LXIII, 1–26.Google Scholar
64.Kreis, H. A., 1929.—Freilebende terrestrische Nematoden aus der Umgebung von Peking (China), Zool. Am., LXXXIV, (11/12), 283–294.Google Scholar
65.Krogbr, , 1890.—Berichte der Versuchsstat. f. Zuckerrohr in West-Java, i.Google Scholar
66.Kohn, J., 1858.—Über das Vorkommen von Anguillula in erkrankten Blutenkopfen von Dipsacus fullonum L, Z. wiss. Zool., ix, 129–137.Google Scholar
67.Kohn, J., 1868.—Über die Wurmkrankheit des Roggens und fiber die iibereinstimmung der Anguillulen des Roggens mit denen der Weberkarde, SitzBer. naiurf. Ges. Halle. 19–26.Google Scholar
68.Kohn, J., 1877–79.—Hallesche Zeitung.Google Scholar
69.Kohn, J., 1881.—Das Luzernälchen, Deuts. landw. Pr., viii, 32.Google Scholar
70.Kohn, J., 1888.—Die Wurmfäule, eine neue Erkranksform der Kartofiel, Z. Spiritlnd., XLIV, 335.Google Scholar
71.Leukel, R. W., 1924.—Investigations on the Nematode Disease of Cereals caused by Tylenchus tritici, J. Agric. Res., xxvii, (12), 925–956.Google Scholar
72.Linstow, O. v., 1876.—Helminthologische Beobachtungen, Arch. Naturgesch. Jahrg., XLII, (1).Google Scholar
73.Linstow, O. v., 1877.—Helminthologica, Arch. Naturgesch. Jahrg., XLIII.Google Scholar
73a.Lounsbury, C. P., 1925.—Report of Division of Entomology 1924–25, Dept. Agric. S. Afr., xi, (6), 586.Google Scholar
74.Löw, F., 1874.—Tylenchus millefolii n. sp., eine neue gallenerzeugende Anguillulide, Abhdl. zool. bot. Ges., xxiv, 17–24. Wien.Google Scholar
75.De Man, J. G., 1876.—Onderzoekingen over vrij in de aarde levende Nematoden, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., ii, 78–196.Google Scholar
76.De Man, J. G., 1880.—Die einheimischen, frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebende Nematoden, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., v, 1–104.Google Scholar
77.De Man, J. G., 1881.—Über einige neue oder noch unvollständig bekannte Arten von frei in der reinen Erde lebenden Nematoden, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., v, 138–143.Google Scholar
78.De Man, J. G., 1884.—Die frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebenden Nematoden der niederländischen Fauna. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79.De Man, J. G., 1892.—Über eine neue, in Gallen einer Meersalge lebende Art der Gattung Tylenchus Bast, Festschrift zum Siebenzigsten Geburtstage Rudolf Leuckart. 121–125.Google Scholar
80.De Man, J. G., 1906.—Observations sur quelques espèces de Nématodes terrestres libres de l'île de Walcheren, Ann. Soc. malac. Belg., xii, 160–163.Google Scholar
81.De Man, J. G., 1921.—Nouvelles Recherches sur les Nématodes libres terricoles de la Hollande, Capita zool., I, (1), 1–62.Google Scholar
82.Marcinowski, K., 1909.—Parasitisch und semiparasitisch an Pflanzen lebende Nematoden, Arb. biol. Anst. f. Land- u. Forstw., vii, (1), 1–192.Google Scholar
83.Micoletzky, H., 1915.—Süsswasser-Nematoden aus Südafrika, in Ergebnisse einer botanischen Forschungsreise nach Deutsch-Ostafrika und Südafrika (Kapland, Natal und Rhodesien), Denkschr. A had. Wiss. Wien, xcii. 149–171.Google Scholar
84.Micoletzky, H., 1921.—Die freilebenden Erd-Nematoden, Arch. Naturgesch., Abt. A. Jahrg., LXXXVII, 1–640.Google Scholar
85.Micoletzky, H., 1922.—Neue freilebende Nematoden aus Suez, SitzBer. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Abt. 1, cxxxi, (4 and 5), 99–100.Google Scholar
86.Micoletzky, H., 1925.—Die freilebenden Süsswasser-und Moornematoden Dänemarks, K danshe Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 8th Ser., x, (2-3), 57–310.Google Scholar
87.Muir, F., & Henderson, G., 1926.—Nematodes in Connection with Sugar Cane Root Rot in the Hawaiian Islands, Hawaii. Plant. Rec., XXX, (2-3), 242–245.Google Scholar
88.Müller, C., 1880.—Einige Bemerkungen über die von Anguillulen auf Achillea erzeugten Gallen, Bot. Centrbl., I, 187–188.Google Scholar
89.Nitschke, , 1868.—Eine neue Roggenkrankheit, Landw. Ztg. nordwestl. Deuts., XXII, 169–170.Google Scholar
90.Oerley, L., 1880.—Monographie der Anguilluliden, Termeszétr. Füz., IV, 1–165.Google Scholar
91.Ouboter, M. P. De Bruyn, 1930.—Tylenchus devastatrix Kühn uit Narcis en Hyacinth, Tijdschr. Plantenziekt., XXXVI, 125–228.Google Scholar
92.Prillieux, E., 1881.—La maladie vermiculaire des Jacinthes, J. Soc. not. hort. Fr., 3rd ser., III, 253–260.Google Scholar
93.Quanjer, H. M., 1927.—Een aaltjesziekte van de aardappelplant, de aantastingswijze en de herkomst van haar oorzaak, Tylenchus dipsaci, Kühn, Tijdschr. Plantenziekt, XXXIII, 137–172.Google Scholar
94.Rahm, G., 1924.—Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Moostierwelt der preussischen Rheinlande, Arch. Naturgesch., Abt. A. Jahrg., XC, (7), 153–214.Google Scholar
95.Ramsbottom, J. K., 1918.—Investigations on the Narcissus Disease, J. R. Hort. Soc., XLIII, 51–64.Google Scholar
96.Ramsbottom, J. K., 1918a.—Experiments on the Control of the Eelworm Disease of Narcissus, J. R. Hort. Soc., XLIII, 60–78.Google Scholar
97.Rensch, B., 1924.—Aphelenchus neglectus n. sp., eine neue parasitäre Nematodenart, Zool. Anz., LIX, 277–280.Google Scholar
98.Robertson, D., 1928.—Observations on the Disease of Oats caused by the Stem Eelworm, Anguittulina dipsaci (Kühn, 1857), Ann. Appl. Biol., XV, (3), 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99.Roffredi, D. M., 1775.—Mémoire sur l'origine des petits vers ou Anguillules du bled rachitique, Observ. Mém. Phys. Hist. Nat., V, (1), 1–19.Google Scholar
100.Roffredi, D. M., 1776.—Mémoire pour servir de supplément et d'éclaircissement aux deux mémoires sur Anguillules du bled avorté et de la colle de farine, Observ. Mém. Phys. Hist. Nat., VII, (1), 369–385.Google Scholar
101.Rostrup, S., Mortensen, M. L., & Kolpi, R. F., 1911.—Oversigt over Landbrugsplanternes Sygdomme i 1910, Tidsskr. Landbr. Planteavl., XVIII, 347.Google Scholar
102.Rostrup, S., 1926.—Førsøg vedrørende Kløveraalens (Tylenchus devastatrix), etc., Tidsskr. Planteavl., XXXII, 762–774. (English Summary.)Google Scholar
103.Schneider, A., 1866.—Monograph der Nematoden. Berlin.Google Scholar
104.Schøyen, W. M., 1885.—Bygaalen (Tylenchus hordei n. sp.) en ny for Bygget skadelig Planteparasit blandt Rundormene, Fork. VidenskSelsk. Krist., 1–16.Google Scholar
105.Slogteren, E. Van, 1920.—Bestrijding in de Bloembollenstreek, Tijdschr. Plantenziekt., XXVI, 126.Google Scholar
106.Slogteren, E. Van 1923.—Address to the members of the International Conference of Phytopathology and Economic Entomology.Google Scholar
107.Soltwedel, , 1888.—Tijdschr. v. Land-en Tuinbouw en Boschcultur in Ned. Ost-Indie, Jaarg., III, 108.Google Scholar
108.Steinbuch, J. G., 1799.—Das Grasaelchen, Vibrio agrostis. Der Naturforscher, XXVIII, 233–259.Google Scholar
109.Steiner, G., 1914.—Freilebende Nematoden aus der Schweiz., I, Arch. Hydriobiol. Plankt., IX, 259–276.Google Scholar
110.Steiner, G. 1925.—The Problem of Host Selection and Host Specialisation of certain Plant-infesting Nemas and its Application in the Study of Nemic Pests, Phytopathology, xv, (9), 499–534.Google Scholar
111.Steiner, G. 1927.—Tylenchus pratensis and various other nemas attacking plants J. Agric. Res., xxxv, (11), 961–981.Google Scholar
111a.Steiner, G. 1931.—On the Status of the Nemic genera Aphelenchus Bastian, Pathoaphelenchus Cobb, Paraphelenchus Micoletzky, Parasitaphelenchus Fuchs, Isonchus Cobb and Seinura Fuchs, J. Wash. Acad. Sci., xxi, (18), 468–475.Google Scholar
112.Stiles, C. W., & Hassall, A., 1920.—Index-Catalogue of Medical and Veterinary Zoology: Roundworms, Hygienic Lab. Bull, 114.Google Scholar
113.Theobald, F. V., 1900–1913.—J. S. E. Agric. Coll., IX–XXII.Google Scholar
113a.Thomson, J. A., 1928.—Scot. J. Agric., xi, (4), 443.Google Scholar
114.Thorne, G., 1926.—Tylenchus balsamophilus, a New Plant Parasitic Nematode, J. Parasit., XII, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
115.Trail, J. W. H., 1881.—Scottish Galls, Scot. Nat., VI, 15–21.Google Scholar
116.Ware, W. M., 1925.—A Disease of Wild White Clover caused by the Eelworm Tylenchus dipsaci (Kühn) Bastian, Ann. Appl. Biol., XII, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
117.Warming, E., 1879.—Knolddannelser paa roderne af Elymus arenarius (in. “ Smaa biologiske o morfologiske Bidrag ”) Bot. Tisskr. (Ser. 3), II, 93–96.Google Scholar
118.Welsford, E. J., 1917.—Investigations of the Bulb Rot of Narcissus, Ann. Appl. Biol., IV, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
119.Wilson, G. F., 1924.—The Eelworm Disease of Phloxes, J. R. Hort. Soc., XLIX, (2-3), 203–Google Scholar
120.Wilson, G. F. 1930.—Further Investigations on the Eelworm Disease of Phloxes, J. R. Hort. Soc., LV, (1), 88–100.Google Scholar
121.Zimmermann, A., 1898.—De Nematoden der Koffiewortels, Meded PlTuin. Batavia, XXVII, (1), 16–41.Google Scholar
122.Zimmermann, A. 1904.—Eenige Pathologische en Physiologische Waarnemingen over Koffie, Meded PlTuin. Batavia, LXIVI, 89–92.Google Scholar