Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:38:56.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Helminth communities of the barbel Barbus barbus from large river systems in Austria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

S. Laimgruber ,
C. Schludermann ,
R. Konecny  and
A. Chovanec
S. Laimgruber
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Institute of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria
C. Schludermann
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Institute of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria
R. Konecny*
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Institute of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria
A. Chovanec
Affiliation:
Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria
*
*Fax: +43 (0)1 4277 9542, E-mail: Robert.Konecny@univie.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The composition and diversity of the total and intestinal component endohelminth communities were determined in the cyprinid barbel from three study areas in two large river systems in Austria. Two sample sites in the Danube and one site in the River Drau are the only free flowing stretches of these rivers in Austria. Nine helminth species were identified, with the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis being dominant in the Danube, with up to 100% prevalence. In the Drau, where the dominant species was the cestode Bathybothrium rectangulum, species diversity was higher than in the Danube.

Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 143 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R.M. (1993) Epidemiology. pp. 75–116 in Cox, F.E.G. (Ed.) Modern parasitology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, R.M. & Kennedy, C.R. (1991a) Potential interactions between Acanthocephalus anguillae and Pomphorhynchus laevis in their natural hosts chub, Leuciscus cephalus and the European eel, Anguilla anguilla . Parasitology 102, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, R.M. & Kennedy, C.R. (1991b) Site availability and density-dependent constraints on the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Parasitology 102, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. & Shostak, A.W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I.E., Gusev, A.V., Dubinina, M.N., Izyumova, N.A., Smirnova, T.S., Sokolovskaya, I.L., Shtein, G.A., Shul'man, S.S. & Epshtein, V.M. (1962) Key to parasites of freshwater fish of the USSR. Jerusalem, Israel, Program for Scientific Translations 1964.Google Scholar
Cakic, P.C., Hegedis, A.E., Kataranovski, D.S. & Lenhardt, M.B. (1998) Endohelminths of Mediterranean barbel, Barbus peloponnesius petenyi, in running waters of West Serbia (Yugoslavia). Folia Zoologica 47 (Suppl.1), 81–85.Google Scholar
Crofton, H.D. (1971a) A quantitative approach to parasitism. Parasitology 62, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H.D. (1971b) A model of host–parasite relationship. Parasitology 63, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Liberato, C., Berrilli, F., Di Cave, D., Russo, R., Tancioni, L. & Kennedy, C.R. (2002) Intestinal helminths of Italian barbel, Barbus tyberinus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae), from the Tiber River and first report of Acanthocephalus clavula (Acanthocephala) in the genus Barbus. Folia Parasitologica 49, 246–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dezfuli, B.S., Zanini, N. & Reggiani, G. (1991) Echinogammarus stammeri (Amphipoda) as an intermediate host for Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) parasite of fishes from the River Brenta. Bollettino di Zoologia. 58, 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezfuli, B.S., Bosi, G. & Rossi, R. (1992) The ultrastructure of the capsule surrounding Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) in its intermediate host Echinogammarus stammeri (Amphipoda). Parasitologia 34, 61–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Dogiel, V.A. (1961) Parasitology of fishes. Edinburgh and London, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Ergens, R. & Lucký, Z. (1959) Dactylogyrus dyki, n. sp. auf den Kiemen der Barbe (Barbus barbus (L.)). Acta Societas Zoologicae Bohemicae. 23, 351–353.Google Scholar
Friedl, T. & Kerschbaumer, G. (2000) Forschungsprojekt Ökosystem Flusskraftwerk Rossegg-St. Jakob, Stand und Zukunftsperspektiven der Bewirtschaftung. Kärntner Institut für Seenforschung.Google Scholar
Gelnar, M., Koubkova, B., Plankova, H. & Jurajda, P. (1996) Report on metazoan parasites of fishes of the river Morava with remarks on the effects of water pollution. Helminthologia 31, 47–56.Google Scholar
Grabda-Kazubska, B. & Pilecka-Rapacz, M. (1987) Parasites of Leuciscus idus (L.), Aspius aspius (L.) and Barbus barbus (L.) from the river Vistula near Warszawa. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 3, 219–230.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Galindo, J.F., Lacasa-Millán, M.I., Castellá-Espuny, J., Munoz-López, E. (1995) Helminths of Barbus meridionalis meridionalis Risso, 1826 in northeastern Spain. Acta Parasitologica 40, 140–141.Google Scholar
Humpesch, U.W. (1994) Quantitative Erfassung des Makrozoobenthos der Stromsohle in der freien Fleißstrecke der österreichischen Donau–Bodenstruktur, Besiedlungsdichte und Besiedlungsstruktur. pp. 109–125 in Kinzelbach, R. (Ed.) Limnologie aktuell, biologie der Donau. Stuttgart-Jena-New York, Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.R. (1985) Interactions of fish and parasite populations: to perpetuate or pioneer? pp. 1–20 in Rollinson, D., Anderson, R.M. (Eds.) Ecology and genetics of host-parasite interactions. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.R. (1996) Colonization and establishment of Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) in an isolated English river. Journal of Helminthology 70, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C.R., Hartvigsen, R.A. (2000) Richness and diversity of intestinal metazoan communities in brown trout Salmo trutta compared to those of eels Anguilla anguilla in their European heartlands. Parasitology 121, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C.R., Bush, A.O. & Aho, J.M. (1986) Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 93, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacek-Mann, H. (1992) Vergleichende populationsdynamische Untersuchung von Barbe (Barbus barbus , L. 1758) und Rußnase (Vimba vimba , L. 1758) im Donaustauraum Altenwörth und der angrenzenden Fließstrecke in der Wachau unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ernährungsökologie. PhD thesis, Universität für Bodenkultur, Vienna, Abteilung für Hydrobiologie, Fischereiwirtschaft und Aquakultur.Google Scholar
Kritscher, E. (1955) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Fischparasiten der Trattnach und des Innbachs bei Bad Schallerbach (O.Ö.). Jahrbuch des Österreichischen Musealvereins 100, 373–389.Google Scholar
Lyndon, A.R. & Kennedy, C.R. (2001) Colonisation and extinction in relation to competition and resource partitioning in acanthocephalans of freshwater fishes of the British Isles. Folia Parasitologica 48, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. London, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, K. (1970) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fischparasitenfauna Ungarns VI. Cestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, Hirudinea. Parasitologia Hungarica 3, 51–76.Google Scholar
Moog, O., Nesemann, H., Waidbacher, H. (1991) Makrozoobenthos-Zönosen ausgewählter Standorte der Donau zwischen Strom-Km 2203 und 2170. Erweiterte Zusammenfassung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie (DGL), Jahrestagung 1991, 290–294.Google Scholar
Moog, O., Humpesch, U.H. & Konar, M. (1995) The distribution of benthic invertebrates along the Austrian stretch of the River Danube and its relevance as an indicator of zoogeographical and water quality patterns: part 1. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Suppl. 101 Large Rivers, 9, 2, 121–213.Google Scholar
Moravec, F. (1995) Trichopteran larvae (Insecta) as the intermediate hosts of Rhabdochona hellichi (Nematoda: Rhabdochonidae), a parasite of Barbus barbus (Pisces). Parasitology Research 81, 268–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moravec, F. (1996) The amphipod Gammarus fossarum as a natural true intermediate host of the nematode Raphidascaris acus . Journal of Parasitology 82, 668–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moravec, F. & Scholz, T. (1991) Observation on the biology of Pomphorhynchus laevis (Zoega in Müller, 1776) (Acanthocephala) in the Rokytná River, Czech and Slovak Federative Republic. Helminthologia 28, 23–29.Google Scholar
Moravec, F. & Scholz, T. (1994) Seasonal occurrence and maturation of Neoechinorhynchus rutili (Acanthocephala) in barbel, Barbus barbus (Pisces), of the Jihlava River, Czech Repuplic. Parasite 1, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravec, F. & Scholz, T. (1995) Life history of the nematode Rhabdochona hellichi, a parasite of the barbel in the Jihlava River, Czech Republic. Journal of Helminthology 69, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moravec, F., Konecny, R., Baska, F., Rydlo, M., Scholz, T., Molnar, K., Schiemer, F. (1997) Endohelminth fauna of barbel, Barbus barbus (L.), under ecological conditions of the Danube basin in Central Europe. Czech Republic, Academia Praha.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.J. (1978) Fish pathology. London, Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Schiemer, F. & Spindler, T. (1989) Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 4, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemer, F. & Waidbacher, H. (1994) Naturschutzerfordernisse zur Erhaltung der typischen Donau-Fischfauna. pp. 247–265 in Kinzelbach, R. (Ed.) Limnologie aktuell, biologie der Donau. Stuttgart-Jena-New York, Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Schludermann, C., Konecny, R., Laimgruber, S., Lewis, J.W., Schiemer, F., Chovanec, A. & Sures, B. (2003) Fish macroparasites as indicators of heavy metal pollution in river sites in Austria. Parasitology 126, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholz, T. & Moravec, F. (1993) Finding of Proteocephalus sp. larva (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) in Sialis lutaria (Insecta: Megaloptera). Acta Societas Zoologicae Bohemicae 57, 159–160.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. & Moravec, F. (1994) Seasonal dynamics of Proteocephalus torulosus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) in barbel (Barbus barbus) from the Jihlava River, Czech Republic. Folia Parasitologica 41, 253–257.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. & Moravec, F. (1996) Seasonal occurrence and maturation of Bathybothrium rectangulum (Cestoda: Amphyicotylidae) in barbel Barbus barbus of the Jihlava River, Czech Republic. Parasite 3, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sures, B. (2001) The use of fish parasites as bioindicators of heavy metals in aquatic ecosystems: a review. Aquatic Ecology 35, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, C.D. (1998) Parasit-Wirt-Beziehungen: Einführung in die ökologische parasitologie. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar