Article contents
Observations on the Morphology of Syngamus of some Wild and Domestic Birds
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2009
Extract
It has been shown that turkeys (Ransom, 1921, and Ortlepp, 1923) and starlings (Lewis, 1925 and 1926) play an important rôle in the distribution of gapes disease.
- Type
- Research Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928
References
Baylis, H. A., 1926.—“A new Species of the Nematode Genus Syngamus.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 9, vol. XVIII., pp. 661–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1923.—“The Anatomy of Monodonius trigonocephalus (Rud.) of Sheep” Journal of Helminthology, vol. I., No. 3, pp. 103–104.Google Scholar
Chapin, E. A., 1925.—“Review of the Nematode Genera Syngamus Sieb. and Cyathostoma E. Blanchard” Journal Agric. Research. Washington. Vol. XXX., 6, pp. 557–570.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1926.—“Gapes” Proc. Zoo. Soc. of London, Part III., pp. 713–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, E. A., 1925.—“Starlings as Distributors of ‘Gapes’” Journal of Helminthology, vol. III., No. 2, pp. 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, E. A., 1926.—“Starlings as Distributors of ‘Gapes’” Journal of Helminthology, vol. IV., No. 2, pp. 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J., 1923.—“The Life History of Syngamus trachealis (Montagu) v. Siebold, the Gape-worm of Chickens” Journal of Helminthology, vol. I., No. 3, pp. 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, B. H., 1921.—“The Turkey an Important Factor in the Spread of Gapeworms. Bulletin No. 939 of the United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Schlotthauber, , 1860.—“Beitrage zur Helminthologie” Amtl. Ber. u. d. 31. Versamml. deutsch. Naturf. u. Aerzle. Gotting (1854), p. 121.Google Scholar
Siebold, C. T. v., 1836.—“Syngamus trachealis. Ein doppelleibiger Eingeweidewurm” Archiv. f. Naturg., 2J., vol. I., pp. 105–116.Google Scholar
Waite, R. H., 1920.—“Earthworms—The Important Factor in the transmission of Gapes in Chickens” Maryl. State Coll. of Agric. Bull. 234, pp. 103–118.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by