Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:47:18.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Three Species of the Genus Capillaria from the English Domestic Fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

D. O. Morgan
Affiliation:
(Senior Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)

Extract

Owing to the lack of adequate descriptions and figures, the majority of the members of the Genus Capillaria are extremely difficult to identify. This is no doubt due, to some extent, to the fact that the worms are so slender that certain morphological features upon which species can be separated are difficult to observe without a very close examination of the worms under high magnification.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux,” p. 19. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberth, C. J., 1863.—“ Untersuchungen über Nematoden,” pp. 4858. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Graybill, H. W., 1924.—“ Capittaria colunibæ (Rud.) from the Chicken and Turkey,” J. Parasit., x (4), pp. 205207. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin-Smith, V., 1920.—“Nematode Parasites of the Domestic Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) in Australia,” Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., XLV (4), pp. 552563.(W.L. 16790A.)Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., 1895.—“Studya Helmintologiczne, I,” Rozpr. Wydz. mat.-przyr. Akad., XXIX [2 s., IX], pp. 349367. (W.L. 19545.)Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., 1901.—“ Studya Helmintologiczne, VI. O czterech gatunkach rodzaju Trichosoma Rud.” Rozpr. Wydz. mat.-przyr. Akad., XXXVIII [2 s., XVIII], pp. 268285.(W.L. 19545.)Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. F. B., 1873.—“Einige neue Nematoden nebst Bemerkungen über bekannte Arten,” Arch. Naturgesch., 39 Jg., I (3), pp. 293306.(W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Molin, R., 1861.—“ Prodromus faunæ helminthologicæ venetæ adjectis disquisionibus auatomicis et criticis,” Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, XIX (2), pp. 189338. (W.L. 7134.)Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1912.—“ Parasitologie des Animaux Domestiques,” pp. 759769.Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1893.—“ Traité de zoologie médicals et agricole,“ 2 Éd., p. 486. Paris.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—“ Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi,“ x + 811 pp. Berolini.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, A. E., 1909.—“ The Thread-Worms (Nematoda) of the Red Grouse (Lagopus scoticus),” Proc. Zool. Soc. Land., pp. 335350. (W.L. 16737.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1914.—“ Sobre as especoes brazileiras do genero ‘Capillaria Zeder,’ 1800.” Brazil-med., XXVIII (47), p. 429. (W.L. 3494.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1915.—“ Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintologica brasileira.V. Sobre as especies brasileiras do genero Capillaria Zeder, 1800.” Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, VII (2), pp. 146171. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar