Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T11:20:17.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Helminths of India. Trematoda IV.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

G. D. Bhalerao
G. D. Bhalerao
Affiliation:
From the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The species Bucephalopsis karvei n. sp. has been described in detail and separated from the allied species. A survey of the work on Bucephalidæ has been given and the species B. magnum, B. confusus and B. minimus have been considered to be synonyms of B. garui. A key to the existing valid species of Bucephalopsis has been given.

The genus Catoptroides has been merged into the synonymy of Phyllodistomum and arguments for so doing have been advanced. Revised diagnosis of Phyllodistomum has been given.

Phyllodistomum shandrai n. sp. has been described and separated from the allied species. P. sp. has been briefly described. Key to the species of Phyllodistomum has been given.

Paramphistomum maplestoni n. sp. and P. cuonum n. sp., have been described and separated from the allied species P. orthocœlium. A few observations on P. sp. from a wild cat and Diplodiscus amphichrus from Rana tigrina have been recorded. Paramphistomum cervi, P. sp., Cotylophoron orientalis and Gastrothylax crumenifer have been recorded from neelgai, hog deer and sable antelope respectively.

Helostomatis sakrei n. sp. has been described and separated from H. helostomatis. A revised diagnosis of Helostomatis has been given.

Neocladorchis poonaensis n.g., n. sp. has been described. The new genus Neocladorchis has been defined and separated from the allied genera.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1937 , pp. 97 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

von Baer, K. E., 1827.—“ Beitrāge zur kenntnis der niederen Thiere.” Nova acta phys.-med. Acad. not. curios., Bonnae, xiii, 523–762.Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1883.—Die thierischen Parasiten des Menschen nebst einer Anleitung zur praktischen Beschäftigung mit der Helminthologie fur Studierende und Aerate, viii + 233 pp., Würzburg.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M.. 1855.—“ Revision der Cercarieen.” S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien., xv. 377–400. (W.L. 20170.)Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. 1859.—“ Nachtrāge und Verbesserungen zur Revision der Myzhelminthen.” S. B. A cad. Wiss. Wien., xxxv, 421–541. (W.L. 20170.).Google Scholar
Eckmann, F., 1932.—“ Beitrage zur kenntnis der Trematodenfamilie Bucephalidae.” Z. Parasitenk., v. 94–111. (IPX. 23536a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischoeder, F.. 1901.—“ Die Paramphistomiden der Sāugethiere.” Zool. Ant., xxiv, 367–375. (IPX. 23833.)Google Scholar
Fischoeder, F. 1903.—“ Die Paramphistomiden der Sāugethiere.” Zool. Jb., Abt. 1, Syst., xvii, 485–660. (IPX. 23831.)Google Scholar
Fukui, T., 1929.—“ Studies on Japanese Amphistomatous Parasites, with Revision of the group.” Jap. J. Zool., II, 219–351. (IPX. 10881q.)Google Scholar
Issaitschikow, I. M., 1928.—“ Zur Kenntnis der parasitischen Würmer einiger Gruppen von Wirbeltieren der russischen Arktis.” [In Russian.] Ber. Wiss. Meeresinsl. iii. 1–79.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. J., 1935.—“The Trematode genus Pkyllodistomum Braun.” Trans. Atner. micr. Soc., liv, 103–117. (IVA. 21400a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccallum, W. G., 1905.—“ On two new Amphistome Parasites from Sumatran fishes.” Zool. Jb., Abt. 1, Syst., xxii, 673–677. (W.L. 23831.)Google Scholar
Manter, H. W., 1934.—“ Some digenetic Trematodes from deepwater fishes of Tortugas, Florida.” Pap. Torlugas Lab., xxviii, 257–345. (W.L. 16014.)Google Scholar
Nicoll, W., 1914.—“ The Trematode parasites of fishes from the English Channel.” J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., x, 466–505. (W.L. 11313.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhner, T., 1905.—“ Die Trematoden des arktischen Gebietes.” Fauna arct., iv, 291–372. (W.L. 8332a.)Google Scholar
Odhner, T. 1910.—“ Nordostafrikanische Trematoden, grösstenteils vom Weissen Nil (von der Schwedischen Zoologischen Expedition gesammelt).” Res. Swedish Zool. Exped. Egypt., iv, (23a), 1–166.Google Scholar
Ozaki, Y., 1924.—“ Studies on the Gasterostome Trematodes with description of three new genera.” Zool. Mag., Tokyo., xxxvi, 173–201. (W.L. 23822a.)Google Scholar
Ozaki, Y. 1928.—“Some Gasterostomatous Trematodes of Japan.” Jap. J. Zool., ii, 35–60. (W.L. 10881q.)Google Scholar
Poche, F., 1907.—“ Einige Bemerkungen zur Nomenclatur der Trematoden.” Zool. Anz., xxxi, 124–126. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi. x+811 pp., 3 pls., Berolini.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Siebold, C. T. E., 1848.—“ Bericht über die Leistungen im Gebiete der Helminthologie wāhrend der Jahre 1845, 1846 und 1847.” Arch. Naturgesch., ii, 351–398. (W.L. 1728.)Google Scholar
Srivastava, H. D., 1934.—“ On new Trematodes of frogs and fishes of the United Provinces, India. Part iv.—The occurrence and seasonal incidence of infection of certain trematodes in the above hosts. Addendum.” Bull. Acad. Sci., Allahabad., iv, 113–120. (W.L. 3691b.)Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W., 1925.—“ On the present status of the Amphistome problem.” Parasitology, xvii. 137–148. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumwalt, M., 1926.—“ Trematode infestation of snakes of San Juan Islands, Puget Sound.” Wash. Univ. Stud. Sci., St. Louis., xiii, 73–101. (W.L. 22796.)Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1934.—“ Synopse dos Paramphistomoidea.” Mem. Jnst. Osw. Cruz., xxix, 19–178. (W.L. 13465.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubangui, M. A., 1933.—“ Trematode parasites of Philippine vertebrates, vi. Descriptions of new species and classification.” Philibp. J. Sci., lvii, 167–197. (W.L. 16189.)Google Scholar
Verma, S. C., 1936.—“ Studies on the family Bucephalidæ (Gasterostomata) Part 1 —Descriptions of forms from Indian Fresh-water fishes.” Proc. Nat. A cad. Sci., India, vi, 66–89.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1934.—“ Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan Part 2. Trematodes of Fishes, 1.” Jap. J. Zool., v, 249–541. (W.L. 10881q.)Google Scholar
Ziegler, H. E., 1883.—“ Bucephalus und Gaslerostomum.” Z. wiss. Zool., xxxix, 537–577. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar