Article contents
A Study of the Potato Eelworm (Heterodera schachtii) in the Irish Free State
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2009
Extract
Before dealing in detail with certain aspects of the research work on the potato eelworm which has been carried out by the present writer an account of the occurrence of the parasite in Ireland must be given.
- Type
- Research Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933
References
Buckhurst, A. S. and Fryer, J. C. F., 1931.—“The problem of ‘potato sickness.’ A report upon certain experiments.” Ann. Appl. Biol., XVIII, 584–601. (W.L. 1025.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, E. E., 1929.—“The control of a serious potato trouble.” J. Minist. Agric., XXXVI, 234–242. (W.L. 11365.)Google Scholar
Miles, H. W., 1930.—“Field studies on Heterodera schachtii Schmidt in relation to the pathological condition known as ‘Potato Sickness’”. J. Helm., VIII, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. O., 1925.—“Investigations on eelworm in potatoes in South Lincolnshire.” J. Helm., III, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. O. 1926.—“Some remarks on the etiology of potato disease in Lincolnshire.” J. Helm., IV, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. O. and Peters, B. G., 1929.—“The potato-root eelworm in Lincoln-shire.” J. Helm., VII 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, D. G. and Prentice, E. G., 1930.—“An eelworm disease of potatoes caused by Heterodera schachtii.” Scot. J. Agric., XIII, 415–432. (W.L. 20010.)Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1926.—“Heterodera schachtii (Schmidt) and soil acidity.” J. Helm., IV, 87–114.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Miles, H. W., 1929.—“Investigations on Heterodera schachiii Schmidt in Lancashire and Cheshire. Part III. Certain correlations between crop yields and degree of infestation.” Ann. Appi. Biol., XVI, 596–601. (W.L. 1025.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Prentice, E.G., 1929.—“Investigations on Heterodera schachtii in Lancashire and Cheshire. Part I. The infestation in certain areasas revealed by cyst counts; an estimation of the errors involved in the technique and a correlation with intensity of diseases.” Ann. Appl. Biol., XVI, 324–339. (W.L. 1025.)Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by