Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T03:19:55.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Editorial report 2022

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2022

Geoffrey M. Hodgson*
Affiliation:
International Management, Loughborough University – London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
*
Corresponding author. Email: g.hodgson2@lboro.ac.uk

Abstract

With its eighteenth annual volume, the Journal of Institutional Economics (JOIE) has come of age. This editorial report looks at the growth of the journal, summarises some of its achievements, reviews progress in addressing diversity and gender balance, outlines current editorial policy, and considers some further issues that are important for the future.

Type
Note
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Random House and London: Profile.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2005) ‘Institutions as A Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, in Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth: Volume 1A, North Holland: Elsevier, pp. 385472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amable, B. (2016), ‘Institutional Complementarities in the Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Capitalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1): 79103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andre, P. and Falk, A. (2021) ‘What's Worth Knowing? Economists’ Opinions about Economics’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 14527, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, V., Gamage, D. K., Hengel, E. and Liu, X. (2021) The Gender Imbalance in UK Economics. London: Royal Economic Society. Available at https://www.res.org.uk/uploads/assets/575c241a-fbff-4ef4-97e7066fcb7597e0/women-in-academic-economics-report-FINAL.pdf. Retrieved 15 April 2022.Google Scholar
Bates, S., Jenkins, L. and Pflaeger, Z. (2012), ‘Women in the Profession: The Composition of UK Political Science Departments by Sex’, Politics, 32(3): 139152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beutel, A. M. and Nelson, D. J. (2006), ‘The Gender and Race-Ethnicity of Faculty in top Social Science Research Departments’, The Social Science Journal, 43: 111125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, K. S. (2011), ‘Do Women Publish Fewer Journal Articles Than Men? Sex Differences in Publication Productivity in the Social Sciences’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(6): 921937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, R. M. (1991), ‘The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence From the American Economic Review’, American Economic Review, 81(5): 10411067.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1969) ‘Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-Scale Model of Omniscience’, in Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. W. (eds), Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences, Chicago: Aldine, pp. 328348. Excerpts reprinted in Hodgson ().Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (2011), ‘Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4): 473498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, J. A. (2021) ‘The 2020 Report on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession’, American Economic Association: News, Issue 1, pp. 1129. Available at https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=13968. Retrieved 14 April 2022.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. E. S. and Ostrom, E., (1995), ‘A Grammar of Institutions’, American Political Science Review, 89(3): 582600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Adderio, L. (2011), ‘Artefacts at the Centre of Routines: Performing the Material Turn in Routines Theory’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2): 197230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, S., De Filippi, P. and Potts, J. (2018), ‘Blockchains and the Economic Institutions of Capitalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(4): 639658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N., (2011), ‘The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines, and Organizational Capabilities: The Poverty of Stimulus’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2): 231256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindis, D. (2009), ‘From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(1): 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1999), Knowledge in A Social World, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Murrell, P., (2021a), ‘A Machine-Learning History of English Caselaw and Legal Ideas Prior to the Industrial Revolution I: Generating and Interpreting the Estimates’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Murrell, P., (2021b), ‘A Machine-Learning History of English Caselaw and Legal Ideas Prior to the Industrial Revolution II: Applications’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(2): 201216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrekson, M. and Sanandaji, T. (2011), ‘The Interaction of Entrepreneurship and Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(1): 4775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindriks, F. and Guala, F., (2015), ‘Institutions, Rules, and Equilibria: A Unified Theory’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3): 459480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, K. (2020) ‘Only 17% of the studies published in top economics journals are by women’, Quartz, 5 August. Available at https://qz.com/1888566/women-author-only-17-percent-of-the-articles-in-top-economics-journals/. Retrieved 15 April 2022.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015a), ‘On Defining Institutions: Rules versus Equilibria’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3): 499505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015b), ‘Much of the “Economics of Property Rights” Devalues Property and Legal Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 683709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019), ‘Taxonomic Definitions in Social Science, with Firms, Markets and Institutions as Case Studies’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(2): 207233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2022), ‘Donald T. Campbell on the Institutions of Scientific Knowledge and the Limits to Interdisciplinarity’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online, doi: 10.1017/S1744137422000121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, L. A. and Leahey, E. (2010), ‘Parenting and Research Productivity: New Evidence and Methods’, Social Studies of Science, 40(3): 433451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern-Goldberger, A. R., James, R., Berghella, V. and Miller, E. S. (2022), ‘The Impact of Double-Blind Peer Review on Gender Bias in Scientific Publishing: A Systematic Review’, American Journal of Obstetric Gynecology, published online, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.030, Retrieved 29 April 2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingston, C. and Caballero, G. (2009), ‘Comparing Theories of Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2): 161180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, J. (1992), Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuncic, A. (2014), ‘Institutional Quality Dataset’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(1): 135161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2001), Individuals, Institutions, and Markets, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (2016), ‘Max U vs. Humanomics: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, J. S. (2015), ‘Entrepreneurial Judgment as Empathic Accuracy: A Sequential Decision-Making Approach to Entrepreneurial Action’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3): 651681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J. and Weingast, B. R. (2009), Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Basurto, X., (2011), ‘Crafting Analytical Tools to Study Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3): 317343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards A Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962), ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva, 1(1): 5473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. and Trebbi, F. (2004), ‘Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 131165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spender, Dale (ed.) (1981), Men's Studies Modified: The Impact of Feminism on the Academic Disciplines, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Vidal-Ortiz, S. (2009) 2009 Report of the American Sociological Association's Committee on the Status of Women in Sociology. Available at https://www.academia.edu/34575111/2009_Report_of_the_American_Sociological_Association_s_Committee_on_the_Status_of_Women_in_Sociology. Retrieved 15 April 2022.Google Scholar
Voigt, S. (2013), ‘How (Not) to Measure Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar