Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T19:05:25.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oliver Williamson and the strategic theory of the firm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2021

Nicholas Argyres*
Affiliation:
Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
Todd Zenger
Affiliation:
Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: argyres@wustl.edu

Abstract

Oliver Williamson's contributions to the theory of the firm were of course seminal. Yet, they were not originally formulated to address the central question in strategic management: Why do some firms persistently outperform others in financial terms? We suggest that when Williamson did address this question, his efforts were not compelling. We also suggest, however, that with suitable adjustments, the key mechanisms in Williamson's theory can indeed usefully address this question.

Type
Note
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amit, R. and Shoemaker, P. (1993), ‘Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent’, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, B. (2005), ‘Teaching Note for International Management Group (IMG)’, Harvard Business School, #705–414.Google Scholar
Anand, B. and Attea, K. (2002), ‘International Management Group (IMG)’. Harvard Business School Case Study #709–402.Google Scholar
Argyres, N. (1996), ‘Evidence On the Role of Firm Capabilities in Vertical Integration Decisions’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(2): 295315.Google Scholar
Argyres, N. and Zenger, T. (2012), ‘Capabilities, Transaction Costs and Firm Boundaries’, Organization Science, 23(6): 16431657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1986), ‘Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy’, Management Science, 47(10): 337358.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1999), ‘How a Firm's Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions’, Sloan Management Review, 40(2): 137146.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (2018), ‘Why Resource-Based Theory's Model of Profit Appropriation must Incorporate a Stakeholder Perspective’, Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 33053325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelsman, E. and Doms, M. (2000), ‘Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 569595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. and Hodgson, G. (2006), ‘The Impact of Tests of Transaction Cost Economics on the Debate on the Nature of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 461476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, K. (1991), ‘An Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?’, Journal of Management, 17(1): 121154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, K. and Prahalad, C. K. (1996), ‘A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge vs. Opportunism’, Organization Science, 7(5): 477501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, J. and Ketchen, D. (1999), ‘Explaining Interfirm Cooperation and Performance: Toward a Reconciliation of Predictions From the Resource-Based View and Organizational Economics’, Strategic Management Journal, 20(9): 867888.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1973), ‘Industry Structure, Market Rivalry and Public Policy’, Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1988), ‘The Theory of the Firm Revisited’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1(1): 141161.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Zenger, T. (2009), ‘Entrepreneurs as Theorists: On the Origins of Collective Beliefs and Novel Strategies’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2): 127146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Zenger, T. (2016), ‘Strategy, Problems, and a Theory for the Firm’, Organization Science, 27(1): 222231.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Zenger, T. (2018), ‘What Sets Breakthrough Strategies Apart’, Sloan Management Review, 59(2): 8688.Google Scholar
Foss, N. and Klein, P. (2012), Organizational Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. and Klein, P. (2015), ‘An Introduction to a Forum on the Judgment-based Approach to Entrepreneurship: Accomplishments, Challenges, New Directions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 29(3): 585599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godley, A. and Casson, M. (2015), ‘Doctor, Doctor…’ Entrepreneurial Diagnosis and Market Making’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(3): 601621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. (1996), ‘Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulbrandsen, B., Lambe, J. and Sandvik, K. (2017), ‘Firm Boundaries and Transaction Costs: The Complementary Role of Capabilities’, Journal of Business Research, 78(6): 193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobides, M. and Hitt, L. (2005), ‘Losing the Forest for the Tree? Productive Capabilities and Gains from Trade vs. Transactional Hazards as Drivers of Vertical Scope’, Strategic Management Journal, 26(13): 12091227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobides, M. and Winter, S. (2005), ‘The Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production’, Strategic Management Journal, 26(5): 395414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A. and Thietart, R. (2013), ‘Capabilities as Shift Parameters for the Outsourcing Decision’, Strategic Management Journal, 31(12): 18811890.Google Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, K. and Alchian, A. (1978), ‘Vertical Integration, Appropriable Quasi-Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process’, Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2): 297326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992), ‘Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology’, Organization Science, 3(3): 383397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996), ‘What Do Firms Do? Coordination, Identity and Learning’, Organization Science, 7(5): 502519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, R. (1992), ‘Transaction Cost Economics in Real Time’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1): 99127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiblein, M. and Miller, D. (2003), ‘An Empirical Examination of Transaction- and Firm-Level Influences on the Vertical Boundaries of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(9): 839859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, S. and Rumelt, R. (1982), ‘Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency Under Competition’, RAND Journal of Economics, 13(2): 418438.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. and Rumelt, R. (2003), ‘A Bargaining Perspective on Resource Advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(11): 10691086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macher, J. and Richman, B. (2008), ‘Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences’, Business and Politics, 10(1): 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhok, A. (2002), ‘Reassessing the Fundamentals and Beyond: Ronald Coase, the Transaction Cost and Resource-Based Theories of the Firm, and the Institutional Structure of Production’, Strategic Management Journal, 23(6): 535551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. (1966), ‘The Power of Power’, in Easton, D. (ed), Varieties of Political Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 3970.Google Scholar
Masten, S., Meehan, J. and Snyder, E. (1991), ‘The Costs of Organization’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7(1): 265273.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. (1977), ‘The Persistence of Profits above the Norm’, Economica, 44(176): 369380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, R. and Wiklund, J. (2018), ‘An Assessment of Resource-Based Theorizing and Suggestions for the Future’, Journal of Management, 44(1): 3260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nickerson, J. and Argyres, N. (2018), ‘Strategizing Before Strategic Decision Making’, Strategy Science, 3(4): 592605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteraf, M. (1993), ‘The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View’, Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syverson, C. (2011), ‘What Determines Productivity?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2): 326365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. (1986), ‘Profiting From Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration and Public Policy’, Research Policy, 15(6): 285305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509533.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1971), ‘The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations’, American Economic Review, 61(2): 112123.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1991), ‘Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1999), ‘Strategy Research: Governance and Competence Perspectives’, Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 10871108.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, C. and Veloso, F. (2008), ‘The Effects of Innovation on Vertical Structure: Perspectives on Transaction Costs and Competences’, Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 586605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollo, M. and Winter, S. (2002), ‘Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities’, Organization Science, 13(3): 339351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar