Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:34:19.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional transformation and development from an economic transition perspective: the case of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2019

Áron Perényi Open the ORCID record for Áron Perényi [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexis Esposto  and
Jill Bamforth
Áron Perényi
Affiliation:
Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
Alexis Esposto
Affiliation:
Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
Jill Bamforth
Affiliation:
Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Economic reforms and political changes often take place simultaneously. The outcomes of reforms in transitional countries depend on the sequence of these changes. Kornai developed his transition framework based on Central and Eastern Europe, and extended it to Asian nations. This article builds on Kornai's model and the institutional dialogue of economic development to construct and apply a model of transformation for Latin America. The aim is to better explain the relationship between institutional transformation and developmental outcomes over time. Our analysis utilises historical information and the views of current political leaders in Argentina. The analysis performed reflects on institutional performance, and evaluates the applicability of the proposed Latin American transition framework in practice. Based on the empirical evidence presented, we argue that economic transition is a path-dependent phenomenon, and that our model explaining the interaction of economic and political changes provides an explanation for the performance of institutional transformation in Argentina.

Keywords

János KornaiArgentinasynchronicityinstitutional transformation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 83 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2010), ‘The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development’, Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2): 1–33.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012), Why Nations Fail – The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. (2005), ‘Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, in: Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001), Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aslund, A. (2002), Building Capitalism – The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babbie, E. (2007), The Practice of Social Research, 11th edn, Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Berend, T. (2009), From the Soviet Bloc to the European Union: The Economic and Social Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe since 1973, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bertola, L. and Ocampo, J. (2012), The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biglaiser, G. (2002), Guardians of the Nation? Economists, Generals and Economic Reform in Latin America, Indiana: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Bolt, J., Inklaar, R., de Jong, H. and van Zanden, J. (2018), ‘Rebasing “Maddison”: new income comparisons and the shape of long-run economic development’, Maddison Project Working paper 10.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, M. (1991), ‘Patterns of Elite Negotiation and Confrontation in Argentina and Chile’, in Higley, J. and Gunther, R. (eds), Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–236.Google Scholar
CEPAL (1950), The Economic Development of Latin America. Economic Commission for Latin America, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Chang, H-J. (2011), ‘Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4): 473–498.Google Scholar
Corbo, V. (1998), ‘Economic Reforms in Latin America: The Decade of Hope’, in: Lin, J. Y. (ed.) Contemporary Economic Issues, International Economic Association Series, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Economist, The (2014, 15 February), ‘A Century of Decline: The Tragedy of Argentina’, The Economist, 410: 18–22.Google Scholar
Emmerson, D. (1995), ‘Region and Recalcitrance: Rethinking Democracy through Southeast Asia’, Pacific Review, 8(2): 223–248.Google Scholar
Esposto, A. and Tohmé, F. (2009), Drifting Apart: The Divergent Development Paths of Argentina and Australia, Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve (2018), ‘ALFRED historical dataset hosted. the St Louis’, available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/docs/api/fred/alfred.html (accessed 27 March 2019).Google Scholar
Freedom House (2018), Freedom in the World 2018 – Democracy in Crisis, New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Fridman, D. (2010), ‘A New Mentality for a New Economy: Performing Homo Economicus in Argentina (1976–83)’, Economy and Society, 39(2): 271–302.Google Scholar
Friedman, E. and Hochstetler, K. (2002), ‘Assessing the Third Transition in Latin American Democratization: Representational Regimes and Civil Society in Argentina and Brazil’, Comparative Politics, 35(1): 21–42.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, F. (2008), ‘Institutions and Economic Change: A Critical Survey of the New Institutional Approaches and Empirical Evidence’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1): 416–443.Google Scholar
Gerchunoff, P. and Fajgelbaum, P. (2005), Two Distant Cousins: An Essay on the Comparative Economic History of Argentina and Australia, Buenos Aires: Fundacion PENT.Google Scholar
Grassi, D. (1998), ‘Democratic Consolidation in Latin America: Recent Theoretical Developments, Facilitating Conditions and Outcomes’, Swiss Political Science Review, 4(3): 7–32.Google Scholar
Gros, D. and Steinherr, A. (2004), Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Planting the Seeds, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. C. (2015), ‘The New Dynamics of Tourism in South East Asia: Economic Development, Political Change and Destination Competitiveness’, Tourism Recreation Research, 40(3): 379–390.Google Scholar
Higley, J. and Gunther, R. (1992), Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and the Southern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2003), A Modern Reader in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Huang, X. (ed.) (2000), The Political and Economic Transition in East Asia: Strong Market, Weakening State, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Iyesaka, K. (1954), ‘On the Definition of Social Institution’, Japanese Sociological Review, 5(1): 2–11.Google Scholar
Karl, T. (1990), ‘Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, 23(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2010), ‘The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010)’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430, Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (1988), ‘Individual Freedom and Reform of the Socialist Economy’, European Economic Review, 32(2–3): 233–267.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (1999), ‘A Rendszerparadigma’, Közgazdasági Szemle, 46(7–8): 1074–1119.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2000), ‘What the Change of System from Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does Not Mean’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1): 27–42.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2006), ‘The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe – Success and Disappointment’, Economics of Transition, 14(2): 207–244.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2008), From Socialism to Capitalism – Eight Essays, Budapest and London: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2010), ‘Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité: Reflections on the Changes Following the Collapse of Communism’, European Review, 18(3): 379–397.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2016a), ‘Még egyszer a “rendszerparadigmáról”: Tisztázás és kiegészítések a posztszocialista régió tapasztalatainak fényében’, Közgazdasági Szemle, 63(10): 1074–1119.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2016b), ‘The System Paradigm Revisited. Clarifications and Additions in Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Region’, Acta Oeconomica, 66(4): 547–596.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1999), ‘The Quality of Government’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 15(1): 222–279.Google Scholar
Lieberman, I. W. (1994), ‘Privatisation in Latin America and Eastern Europe in the Context of Political and Economic Reform’, World Economy, 17(4): 551–576.Google Scholar
Lipton, D., Sachs, J., Fischer, S. and Kornai, J. (1990), ‘Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland; Comments and Discussion’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 21(1): 75–148.Google Scholar
Llamazares, I. (2005), ‘Patterns in Contingencies: The Interlocking of Formal and Informal Institutions in Contemporary Argentina’, Social Forces, 83(4): 1671–1696.Google Scholar
March, J. and Olsen, J. (2008), ‘Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”’, in: Binder, S. A., Rhodes, R. A. W. and Rockman, B. A. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. (1993), ‘Direct Investment in South-East Asia and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis’, in Artisien-Maksimenko, P. and Rojec, M. (eds), Foreign Investment and Privatization in Eastern Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Munck, G. and Leff, C. (1997), ‘Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Politics, 29(3): 343–362.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (1994), ‘The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1): 47–63.Google Scholar
North, D. (1981), Growth and Structural Change, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1991), Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 97–112.Google Scholar
North, D. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, T. (2013), The Pragmatic Turn of Democracy in Latin America, Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Preston, P. (2017), Political Cultural Developments in East Asia: Interpreting Logics of Change, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Remmer, K. (1992), ‘The Process of Democratization in Latin America’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 27(4): 3–24.Google Scholar
Sanz-Villaroya, I. (2005), ‘The Convergence Process of Argentina with Australia and Canada: 1875–2000’, Explorations in Economic History, 42(3): 439–458.Google Scholar
Sanz Villarroya, I. (2009), ‘Macroeconomic Outcomes and the Relative Position of Argentina's Economy, 1875–2000’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(2): 309–346.Google Scholar
Shimomura, Y., Kohsaka, A., Kuchiki, A., Nariai, O., Sugita, N., Hosaka, S., Mihira, T., Tsuchikawa, H., Tsunekawa, M. and Uchikawa, M. (1994), Transition to Market Economies in Asia, Tokyo, Japan: Economic Research Institute, Economic Planning Agency.Google Scholar
Smithies, A. (1965), ‘Argentina and Australia’, American Economic Review, 55(1): 17–30.Google Scholar
Smits, J., Woltjer, P. and Ma, D. (2009), ‘A Dataset on Comparative Historical National Accounts, ca. 1870–1950: A Time-Series Perspective’, Groningen Growth and Development Centre Research Memorandum GD-107, Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Solinger, D. (1993), China's Transition from Socialism? Statist Legacies and Market Reforms, 1980–90, Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Street, J. (1987), ‘The Institutionalist Theory of Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Issues, 21(4): 1861–1887.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., Foster, W. and Mills, A. (2014), ‘Historical Institutionalism’, in Bucheli, M. and Wadhwani, R. D. (eds), Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szelényi, I. (2004), ‘Kapitalizmusok, szocializmusok után’, Egyenlítő, 2(4): 2–11.Google Scholar
Teubal, M. (2004), ‘Rise and Collapse of Neoliberalism in Argentina: the Role of Economic Groups’, Journal of Developing Societies, 20(173): 173–188.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. (1994), ‘The Internal Organization of Government’, Oxford Economic Papers, 46(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Thorp, R. (1998), Progress, Poverty and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century, Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2018), Corruption Perceptions Index 2018, Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
UNDP (2016), Human Development Report 2016 – Human Development for Everyone, New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
World Bank (2018), World Development Indicators 2018, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Veigel, K. (2009), Dictatorship, Democracy and Globalization: Argentina and the Cost of Paralysis, 1973–2001, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Zikmund, W., Babin, B., Carr, J. and Griffin, M. (2013), Business Research Methods. Mason, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar