Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:29:46.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Civil-Military Relations in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Extract

It is hardly necessary to assert that the armed forces have been important factors in the historical development of the nations of Latin America. By bringing into association men from all parts of the national territory, by posing as the incarnation of the national spirit, and by teaching patriotism and exalting national virtues, they have been a significant influence in overcoming regionalism and localism. By providing an avenue for advancement for members of lower social strata, they have encouraged social mobility. In many countries they have contributed to the transition from traditional to modern societies through their work in constructing communications systems, their emphasis on general and technical education within their ranks, and by their demands for industrialization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alba, Víctor. “Armas, poder y libertad,” Combate, I (No. 1 — No. 6).Google Scholar
Andrzejewsky, Stanislaw. Military Organization and Society. London, 1954.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “The Concept of Scientific History,” History and Theory, (1960), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Marc L. B. Les caracteres originaux de l'histoire rurale frangaise. Oslo, 1931.Google Scholar
Borah, Woodrow and Cook, S. F. The Population of Central Mexico in 1548 [Ibero-Americana: 43]. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1960.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. et al. The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, 1960.Google Scholar
Craig, Gordon A. The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640-1945. Oxford, 1955.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. “History and the Social Sciences,” in Stern, Fritz, ed., The Varieties of History. New York: Meridian Books, 1956.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, ed. Soldiers and Governments. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. Stuart. “The Historian and the Social Scientist,” The American Historical Review, LXVI (1960), 2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, Mass., 1959.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Morris. The Professional Soldier; a Social and Political Portrait. Glencoe, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadduri, Majid. “The Role of the Military in Middle East Politics,” American Political Science Review, XLVII (1953), 511-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D.The Garrison State,” American Journal of Sociology, XLVI (1941), 455468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieuwen, Edwin. Arms and Politics in Latin America. New York, 1960.Google Scholar
Maxon, Yale C. Control of Japanese Foreign Policy; a Study of Civil-Military Rivalry, 1930-1945. Berkeley, 1957.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret and Métraux, Rhoda, eds. The Study of Culture at a Distance. Chicago, 1953.Google Scholar
Morner, Magnus. “Caudillos y militares en la evolución hispanoamericana,” Journal of Inter-American Studies, II (1960), 295310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosca, Gaetano. The Ruling Class (Elementi di scienze politico). New York, 1939.Google Scholar
Namier, Lewis. The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III. London, 1929.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A.The Army and the Founding of the Turkish Republic,” World Politics, XI (1959), 513552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Science Research Council. The Social Sciences in Historical Study [Bulletin 64]. New York, 1954.Google Scholar
Vagts, Alfred. A History of Militarism. New York, 1960.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tubingen, 1922.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, Theodore. “The Role of the Military in Contemporary Latin American Politics,” The Western Political Quarterly, XIII (1960), 745-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar