Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T16:49:02.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transition to Democracy in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Scott Mainwaring
Scott Mainwaring*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On January 15,1985, Brazil elected a new president, 74 year-old Tancredo Neves, a moderate career politician who had been one of the important leaders of the opposition to the military regime which took power in 1964. Tancredo died before assuming office, but the elected Vice-president elect, José Sarney, took over the Executive Office on March 15,1985, bringing to an end 21 years of military rule. Arguably, the transition in Brazil is the most important of the recent transitions in South America (Argentina, Uruguay, Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia), given the country's size, population, and influence, and given the fact that Neves' election marked the demise of the most successful and long-lived bureaucratic-authoritarian regime in the region. As a result, the nature and implications of the Brazilian transition will have considerable significance for understanding the political reality of the region during the next several years.

Type
Transition to Democracy: Two case Studies
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Spring 1986 , pp. 149 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, M. Moreira (forthcoming) State and Opposition in Military Brazil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Boschi, R. (ed.) (1983) Movimentos Coletivos no Brasil Urbano. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Zahar.Google Scholar
Cardoso, F. (1983) “O Papel dos Empresarios no Processo de Transicao: O Caso Brasileiro.” dados 26, 1: 9–28.Google Scholar
Da Matta, R. (1979) Carnavais, Malandros e Herois; Para uma Sociologia do Dilema Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Zahar.Google Scholar
Dassinj. (1984) “The Brazilian Press and the Politics of Abertura? ”, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 26, 3 (August): 385–414.Google Scholar
Dreifuss, R. and Soares Dulci (1983) “As Forcas Armadas e a Política,” pp. 87–117 in Sabastiao Velasco e Cruz et al., Sociedade e Política no Brasil pos. 64., São Paulo, Brasil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Faoro, R. (1958) Os Donos do Poder. Porto Alegre, Brasil: Globo.Google Scholar
Flynn, P. (1979) Brazil: A Political Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, D. (1984a) “Constitutional and Electoral Engineering in Brazil: A Double-Edged Sword, 1964-1982.” Journal of Inter-American Economic Affairs 37 (Spring): 3–36.Google Scholar
Fleischer, D. (1984b) Do Antigo ao Novo Pluripartidarismo: Partidos e Sistemas Partidarios no Congresso Nacional, 1945T984. Brasilia, Brasil: Brasilia.Google Scholar
de Goes, W. and de Camargo, A. (1984) O Drama da Sucessao e a Crise do Regime. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. (1982) Capitalist Control and Workers’ Struggle in the Brazilian Auto Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jenks, M. (1979) “Political Parties in Authoritarian Brazil.” Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Lamounier, B. (1980) “O Voto em São Paulo, 1970-1978,” pp. 15–80 in Lamounier, B. (ed.) Voto de Desconfianca. Petrópolis, Brasil: Vozes/ CEBRAP (Centro Brasiliero de Analise e Planeiamento).Google Scholar
Lamounier, B. (1979) “O Discurso e o Processo: Da Distensao Opcoñes do Regime Brazileiro,” pp. 88–120 in Rattner, Henrique (ed.) Brasil 1990: Caminhos Alternativos do Desenvolvimento. São Paola, Brasil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Lamounier, B. and Cardoso, F. (eds.) (1976) Os Partidos e as Eleicoes no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Lamounier, B. and de Souza, A. (1981) “Governo e Sindicatos no Brasil: A Perspectiva dos Anos 80.” dados 24, 2:139–159.Google Scholar
Lessa, C. et al., (1983) Desenvolvimento Capitalista no Brasil. São Paolo, Brasil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Levine, D. (1973) Conflict and Political Change in Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (1973) “The Future of an Authoritarian Situation or the Institutionalization of an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Brazil,” pp. 233–254 in Stepan, Alfred (ed.) Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (forthcoming) “Grass Roots Popular Movements and the Struggle for Democracy: Nova Iguacu, 1974-1985,” in Stepan, A. (ed.) Democratizing Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (1986) The Catholic Church and Politics in Brazil, 1916-1985. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. and Share, D. (forthcoming) “Transitions Through Transaction: Democratization in Brazil and Spain,” in Selcher, Wayne (ed.) Political Liberalization in Brazil: Dynamics, Dilemmas, Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. and E. Viola (1985) “Transitions to Democracy: Brazil and Argentina in the 1980s.” Journal of International Affairs 38 (Winter): 193–219.Google Scholar
Martins, J. de Souza (1984) A Militarizacao da Questao Agraria no Brasil. Petrópolis, Brasil: Vozes.Google Scholar
Martins, J. de Souza (1980) Expropriagao e Violencia: A Questao Política no Campo. São Paulo, Brasil: Hucitec.Google Scholar
Moisés, J. et. al., (1982a) Alternativas Populares da Democracia. Petrópolis, Brasil: Vozes/CEDEC.Google Scholar
Moisés, J. (1982b) Licoes de Liberdade e de Opressao. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Moisés, J. (1978) “Experiencias de Mobilizacao Popular em São Paulo.” Controponto III, 3: 69–86.Google Scholar
Novos Estudos CEBRAP (Centro Brasiliero de Analise e Planeiamento) (1984) Volume 10 (October).Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G (1984) “A mi que me importa: Notas sobre sociabilidad y política en Argentina y Brasil.” Kellogg Institute Working Paper 9. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, Kellog Institute.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G (1982) El estado burocrático-autoritario, 1966-1973. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial de Belgrano.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G (1979a) “Notas para el estudio de procesos de democratización política a partir del estado burocrático-autoritario.” Estudios CEDES (Centro Estudio de Estado y Sociedad) II, 5.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G (1979b) “Tensions in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy,” pp. 285–318 in Collier, David (ed.) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G, Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L. (eds.) (forthcoming) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Southern Europe and Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Opiniao (Rio de Janeiro) (1974) 2 (September).Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. (1976) La crisis de las dictaduras. Madrid, Spain: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Rustow, D. (1970) “Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics II (April): 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
dos Santos, W (1980) “A Ciencia Política na América Latina: Notas Preliminares de Autocrftica.” dados 23,1:15–27.Google Scholar
dos Santos, W (1978) Poder e Política-. Crónica do Autoritarismo Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Forense-Universitaria.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. (1971) The Political System of Brazil: Emergence of a ‘Modernizing’ Authoritarian Regime, 1964-1970. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, G. de Couto e (1981) Conjuntura Política Nacional, O Poder Executivo e Geopolítica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: José Olimpio.Google Scholar
Singer, P. and Brant, V (1980) São Paulo: O Povo em Movimento. Petrópolis, Brasil: Vozes/CEBRAP (Centro Brasileiro de Analise e Planeiamento).Google Scholar
Soares, G. Dillon (1984) Colegio Eleitoral, Convencoes Partidarias e Eleicoes Diretas. Petrópolis, Brasil: Vozes.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (forthcoming) “Military Politics and Three Polity Arenas: Civil Society, Political Society, and the State,” in Stepan, A. (ed.) Democratizing Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (1971) The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tavares De Almeida, M. (1981) “Tendencias Recentes de Negociacao Coletiva no Brasil.” dados 24, 2:161–189.Google Scholar
Tavares, M. da Conceicao and David, M. (eds.) (1981) A Economia Política da Crise. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Vozes/Achiame.Google Scholar
Trindade, H. (1985) “Bases da Democracia Brasileira: Lógica Liberal e Praxis Autoritaria, 1822-1945,” pp. 46–72 in Rouquié, Alain, et al., (eds.) Como Renascem as Democracias. São Paulo, Brasil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Velasco e Cruz, S. and Estevam Martins, C. (1983) “De Castello a Figueiredo: Uma Incursao na pré-História da Abertura,'” pp. 13–61 in Sorj, Bernard and María Herminia Tavares de Almeida (eds.) Sociedade e Política no Brasil pós-64. São Paolo, Brasil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Weffort, F. (1984) Por que Democracia? São Paolo, Brasil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
World Bank (1983) World Bank Development Report, 1983. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar