Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:29:44.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bankers Versus Diplomats: The Debate Over Mexican Insolvency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stephen D. Bodayla
Stephen D. Bodayla*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Marycrest College, Davenport, Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The question of state insolvency has been a recurring problem in modern history. Defaults have plagued investors and damaged many nations' credit on international money markets. Other nations have suffered due to investor anxieties resulting from defaults by their neighbors. Politicians, diplomats, financiers, and investors have differed greatly in their proposed solutions to the problems of national fiscal failure. The experience of Mexico in its postrevolutionary era is a classic example of the myriad problems faced by those who assist in the financial rehabilitation of the distressed nation, as well as by those who seek to protect investors.

The first half-century after Mexico won its independence was characterized by almost constant domestic strife, frequently humiliating international relations, and a tendency toward fiscal irresponsibility. It was not until Porfirio Díaz seized the presidency from Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada in 1876 that Mexico experienced a degree of domestic tranquility which earned it the tolerance begrudgingly granted by powerful states to their weaker but stable brethren.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , November 1982 , pp. 461 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baring, E. (1909) Modern Egypt. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bodayla, S. D. (1977) “The impact of the 1930 New Jersey primary election on Mexican-American relations.” New Jersey History 95 (Autumn): 145–156.Google Scholar
CNO [U.S. Office of the Chief of Naval Operations] (1928) Report of the Naval Attaché. February 14, Record Group 38.Google Scholar
Cumberland, C. C. (1952) The Mexican Revolution: Genesis Under Madero. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, L. E. (1958) “Dwight Morrow and the church-state controversy in Mexico.” Hispanic Amer. Historical Rev. 38 (November): 482-505.Google Scholar
Frus [Foreign Relations of the U.S.] (1954) Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States … 1929. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Frus [Foreign Relations of the U.S.] (1953) Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States … 1928. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1929a) Lamont to Morgan, May 3. Box 192.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1929b) Lamont to Morgan, March 2. Box 192.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1929c) Anderson to Lamont, January 2. Box 192.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1928a) Morrow to Lamont, October 12. Box 192.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1928b) Lamont to Morgan, January 16. Box 192.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1927) Munroe to Morrow, November 22. Box 196.Google Scholar
Lamont Papers (1922) Statement of Modification of Plan and Agreement dated June 16, 1922. Box 192.Google Scholar
Mexico, Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público (1924) La controversia Pani-de la Huerta: documentos para la historia de la ultima asonda militar. Mexico City: Talleres Gráficos de la Nación.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. (1977) Historia de la revolución mexicana, período 1924-1928: estado y sociedad con Calles. México City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (1978) Historia de la revolución mexicana, período 1928-1934: los inicios de la institucionalización la política del maximato. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1930a) Memorandum of telephone conversation between Lamont and Morrow. July 23.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1930b) Memorandum, July 10.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1929a) Morgan to Morrow, May 29.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1929b) Memorandum for Capt. McBride, March 19.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1929c) Morrow to Clark, March 12.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1929d) Morrow to Munroe, February 26.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1929e) Lamont to Montes de Oca, January 25.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928a) Morrow to Lamont, November 29.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928b) Montes de Oca to Lamont, November 20.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928c) Lamont to Montes de Oca, September 28.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928d) Montes de Oca to Lamont, September 10.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928e) Sterrett to Anderson, September 6.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928F) Morrow to Kellogg, August 6.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928g) Morrow to Kellogg, August 5.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928h) Memorandum, August 4.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928i) Montes de Oca to Lamont, August 4.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928j) Morrow to Kellogg, August 3.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928k) Morrow to Kellogg, July 31.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (19281) Lamont to Montes de Oca, July 10.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928m) Anderson to Montes de Oca, June 26.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928n) Montes de Oca to Lamont, June 12.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928o) Memorandum on conference with Montes de Oca, May 26.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928p) Memorandum on the public debt of Mexico, May 20.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928q) Morrow to Anderson, April 5.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928r) Morrow to Rublee, February 2.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928s) Morrow to Munroe, January 10.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928t) Morrow to Anderson, January 8.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1928u) Morrow to Lamont, January 3.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1927a) Rublee to Morrow, December 31.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1927b) Morrow to Olds, December 9.Google Scholar
Morrow Papers (1927c) Lamont to Cochran, Anderson, and Munroe, July 11.Google Scholar
Murray, R. H. [ed. and trans.] (1927) Mexico Before the World: Public Documents and Addresses of Plutarco Elias Calles. New York: Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nicolson, H. (1935) Dwight Morrow. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. E. (1960) The Mexican Revolution, 1914-1915. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rublee, G. (1951) The Reminiscences of George Rublee. New York: Columbia University Oral History Office.Google Scholar
Sheffield Papers (1926) Sheffield to Kellogg, January 12. Box 8.Google Scholar
Sterrett, J. E. (1928) The Fiscal and Economic Condition of Mexico: Supplemental Report Dated November 15, 1928. New York: Privately printed.Google Scholar
Turlington, E. W. (1930) Mexico and Her Foreign Creditors. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. T. (1957) The Reminiscences of James T. Williams. New York: Columbia University Oral History Office.Google Scholar
Wynne, W. H. (1951) State Insolvency and Foreign Bondholders. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar