Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:13:10.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Illicit Drug Traffic: Implications for South American Source Countries*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Richard B. Craig
Richard B. Craig*
Affiliation:
Kent State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Students of the drug abuse problem may begin their analyses either at home or abroad. One observer might view the importing nation as the source of the problem, arguing that without its demand/ profit structure there would be no need for another country to grow, or to ship, illicit drugs. A second analyst might, with equal logic, contend that demand is a given, hence the producing country has the obligation, as a member of the family of nations and as signatory to international narcotics conventions, to eliminate domestic trafficking in, and production of, illegal narcotics. Regardless of whether one approaches the problem from the standpoint of either the chicken or the egg, the unassailable fact is that the illicit narcotraffic carries multiple impacts for the source countries.- social, economic and political.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Summer 1987 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was originally presented at the conference on “International Drugs: Threat and Response,” held at the Defense Intelligence College, 2-3 June 1987, in Washington, DC.

References

Bridges, T. (1987). “Peruvian Rebels Supplant Army as Shield for Drug Producers.” Wall Street Journal (1 May).Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1985). “Illicit Drug Traffic and US-Latin American Relations.” Washington Quarterly, 8:105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. (1983) “Domestic Implications of Illicit Colombian Drug Production and Trafficking.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 25, 3: 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. (1981) “Colombian Narcotics and United States-Colombian Relations.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 23, 3: 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, T. Jr. (1987) “The Shining Path to Peruvian Democratization.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Council of Latin American Studies, Santa Fe, NM, April.Google Scholar
Diehl, J. (1984, December 29). “Model Antidrug Drive Fails in Peru.” Washington Post (29 December):Google Scholar
Excelsior (Mexico City). (1987) “Colabarán las FARC en la lucha de Barco contra el narcotráfico.” 11 January: 2.Google Scholar
Gelles, R. (1985). “Coca and Andean Culture-The New Dangers of an Old Debate.” Cultural Survival Quarterly 9: 20–23.Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1986). “The Boom within the Crisis: Some Recent Effects of Foreign Cocaine Markets on Bolivian Rural Society and Economy;’ pp. 101–143 in Pacini, D. & Franquemont, C. (eds.) Coca & Cocaine: Effects on People and Policy in Latin America. Peterborough, NH: Cultural Survival.Google Scholar
Henkel, R. (1984 est.). “Coca & Cocaine-The Industry and its Impact.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Geography. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Henman, A. (1985). “Cocaine Futures,” pp. 118–189 in Henman, A., Lewis, R., & Maylon, T. (eds.) Big Deal: The Politics of the Illicit Drug Business. London, England: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report-Andean Group (LARR-AG) (1987) 9 April: 7.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report-Andean Group (1986a) 16 May: 2.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report-Andean Group (1986b) 11 December: 4–5.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (LAWR) (1987) 11 June: 2.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (LAWR) (1986a) 17January: 2–3.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (LAWR) (1986b) 3 July: 3.Google Scholar
Niedergang, M. (1987) “Some See Answer to Colombia's Problems in Legal Drugs.” Le Monde/Manchester Guardian Weekly (11 January).Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, A. (1986) March 11). “In Colombia, It's No Problem to Launder Loot.” Miami Herald (11 March).Google Scholar
Riding, A. (1987). “Cocaine Billionaires: The Men Who Hold Colombia Hostage.” New York Times (8 March).Google Scholar
Samper Pizano, E. (1979). “Marihuana: entre la represión y legalización,” pp. 15–23 in ANIF (ed.) Marihuana: legalización o represión. Bogotá, Colombia: Biblioteca ANIF.Google Scholar
US Department of State. Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (BINM) (1987) International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Department of State. Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (BINM) (1986) International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vélez, G., Pérez, J., and Tamayo, G. (1981). “La cocaína y la marihuana en Colombia, 1972-1978.” Revista EAFIT, 39:78–107.Google Scholar