Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T09:18:55.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Will Soldiers Follow? Economic Integration and Regional Security in the Southern Cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

David Pion-Berlin*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside

Abstract

MERCOSUR’s success as an economic bloc suggests that it could serve as a stimulus or even a model for security integration. Improved military ties among the MERCOSUR nations have grown out of a sequence of developments, from political rapprochement to economic convergence and improved civilian state control. Yet increased cooperation has not led to a regional defense system. Case studies reveal that national considerations have inhibited most MERCOSUR members from accepting the idea of a regional security alliance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, Carlos H., and William, C. Smith 1995. The Politics of “Military Economics” in the Southern Cone: Comparative Perspectives on Democracy and Arms Production in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Political Power and Social Theory 9: 121–57.Google Scholar
Agência Estado (News Agency of Brazil). 1997. Brazil-Argentine Military Accord Said to Show “Common Strategic Vision.” Global Newsbank. April 27. http:infoweb.newsbank.com.Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe. 1994. The Latin American Military: Development, Reform, and “Nation-Building”? in Schoultz et al. 1994 243–64.Google Scholar
Ambito Financiero (Buenos Aires). 1997. Mercosur: el país quiere a Brasil como socio militar. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (July 21): 12.Google Scholar
Balza, Martin. 1995. La seguridad entre los paises del Mercosur. Seguridad Estratégica Regional 8 (October: 2527.Google Scholar
Barletta, M. 1998. Democratic Security and Diversionary Peace: Nuclear Confidence-Building in Argentina and Brazil. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Los Angeles. March.Google Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 1992. Systems for Peace or Causes of War? Collective Security, Arms Control, and the New Europe. International Security 17 (Summer: 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Richard J., and Gregory, F. Treverton, eds. 1990. Alternative to Intervention: A New U.S.-Latin American Security Relationship. Boulder : Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Paul G. 1996. U.S. Defense Policy for the Western Hemisphere: New Wine in Old Bottles, Old Wine in New Bottles, or Something Completely Different Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 38, 1 (Spring): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 1998. Factbooks on Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. Online Political Data Base of the Americas. http:www.georgetown.edupdba.Google Scholar
Child, Jack. 1995. Confidence-building Measures and Their Application in Central America. in Varas et al. 1995 521.Google Scholar
Clarín (Buenos Aires). 1997. Buscan crear un esquema defensivo común con Brasil. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (June 9): 1.Google Scholar
Clarín (Buenos Aires). 1998a. Argentina y Chile realizan maniobras navales. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (April 23): 1.Google Scholar
Clarín (Buenos Aires). 1998b. Mercosur crean un foro de consulta antidrogas. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (June 1): 1.Google Scholar
Clarín (Buenos Aires). 1998c. Plan de seguridad para la triple frontera. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (March 28): 1.Google Scholar
EL Cronista Comercial (Buenos Aires). 1996. Ciudad del Este, meca del terrorismo y el contrabando. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (May 20): 12.Google Scholar
deTorre, Enrique. 1993. Director, Security Department, Argentine Foreign Affairs Ministry. Author interview. Buenos Aires. July 21.Google Scholar
Diamint, Rut. 1998. Argentina y la seguridad internacional. Santiago, Chile : Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).Google Scholar
Diario Noticias (Private communications network, Asunción). 1996. Paraguay fue excluido de operativo antidroga de Eeuu. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (May 14): 12.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1998. Security, Peace, and Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges for the Post–Cold War Era. In Domínguez, ed. 1998. 328.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., ed. 1998. International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post–Cold War Era. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Downes, Richard. 1996. Emerging Patterns of Security Cooperation in the Western Hemisphere. North-South Issues 5, 1: 18.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12, 3 (Summer): 205–35.Google Scholar
Druetta, Gustavo, and Luis, Tibiletti. 1992. El significado de los simposios de estudios estratégicos de los estados mayores conjuntos de Argentina, Brasil, y Uruguay, en la cooperación regional para la paz. In Seguridad, paz, y desarme: propuestas de concertación pacífica en América Latina y el Caribe: estudio estratégica de América Latina, 1990–91. Santiago, Chile : Centro Latinoamericano de Defensa y Desarme (CLADDE)/FLACSO.. 105–28.Google Scholar
Economist . 1996. A Survey of Mercosur: Remapping South America. Supplement. 341, 7987 (October 12): 330.Google Scholar
Escudé, Carlos. 1997. Foreign Policy Theory in Menem’s Argentina. Gainesville : University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Escudé, Carlos, and Andrés, Fontana. 1998. Argentina’s Security Policies: Their Rationale and Regional Context. In Domínguez, ed. 1998. 5179.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Aldo. 1996. Mercosur: trayectoria, situación actual y perspectivas. Desarrollo Económico 35 (January–March: 563–83.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. Samuel. 1994. The Decline of U.S. Military Influence in Latin America. in Schoultz et al. 1994 77113.Google Scholar
Foreign Broadcast Information Service-Latin America (FBIS-LAT). 1984. Text Released of Beagle Treaty with Chile. October 23: B3.Google Scholar
Foreign Broadcast Information Service-Latin America (FBIS-LAT). 1993. Army to Study Project for Northern Border Areas. May 18: 16.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1996. Brazil: Further Details on New Defense Policy. November 8: 1, 3. http:wnc.fedworld.gov.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1997a Argentina: Army Chief of Staff Leaves for South Cone Drill in Brazil. August 27: 1.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1997b. Brazil: Cardoso Discusses Regional Issues. September 28: 5.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1998a. Argentina: Navy Exercises with Chile Begin in Southern Waters. August 10: 1.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1998b. Argentine Military Want to Create Small South Nato. August 26: 1.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1998c. Uruguay: Decade-long Increase in Mercosur Trade Noted. February 12: 1.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1998d. Uruguay: Mercosur Countries’ Military Policies Viewed. February 2: 13.Google Scholar
FBIS-LAT Online. 1999. What Would Happen if Paraguay Left Mercosur? March 28: 1.Google Scholar
Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad (Santiago). 1997. President Eduardo Frei Presents Chile’s Book of National Defense. 12, 3 (July–September): 4346.Google Scholar
O Globo (Rio de Janeiro). 1998a. Forças armadas podem combater o narcotráfico. http:www.oglobo.com.brarchivopais. (June 29): 2.Google Scholar
O Globo (Rio de Janeiro). 1998b. Queridos hermanos. February 6: 1.Google Scholar
Guedes Costa, Thomaz. 1993. Mercosur, seguridad regional y defensa nacional en Brasil. Revista Seguridad Estratégica Regional 4 (September: 810.Google Scholar
Guedes Costa, Thomaz. 1994. Post–Cold War Military Relations between the United States and Latin America. in Schoultz et al. 1994 137–50.Google Scholar
Guedes Costa, Thomaz. 1995. The Concept of Confidence Building: a Brazilian Perspective. in Varas et al. 1995 3542.Google Scholar
Guedes Costa, Thomaz. 1998. Democratization and International Integration: The Role of the Armed Forces in Brazil’s Grand Strategy. In Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe, ed. David, R. Mares. Boulder : Westview Press. 223–37.Google Scholar
Hirst, Mónica, and Maria daConçeição, Tavares 1988. Argentina-Brasil: el largo camino de la integración. Buenos Aires : Editorial Legasa.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. F. 1966. Collective Security and Military Alliances. In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, ed. Herbert, Butterfield and Martin, Wight. Cambridge : Harvard University Press. 176–80.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians Against Soldiers. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1998. Email communication with the author.Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). 199596. The Military Balance. London : IISS.Google Scholar
Jaunarena, José H. 1997. Cooperación multilateral en materia de seguridad. Revista Seguridad Estratégica Regional (July 10): 1–4. See also Ser en el 2000 Online Database.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A., and Clifford, Kupchan. 1995. The Promise of Collective Security. International Security 20 (Summer: 5261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 199596. The Political Economy of Mercosur. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 35, 4 (Winter): 101–41.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Nazrin, Abdolali. 1989. Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816–1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33: 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, David R., and Steven, A. Bernstein 1998. The Use of Force in Latin American Interstate Relations. In Domínguez, ed. 1998. 223–37.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1997. Political Scientist Views Regional Military Balance. February 21: C4.Google Scholar
La Nación (Buenos Aires). 1998a. Di Tella se interesó en el centro de lucha contra el narcotráfico. February 13: 1. http:www.lanacion.com.ar.Google Scholar
La Nación (Buenos Aires). 1998b. Hipótesis de integración y de confianza. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (April 8): 12.Google Scholar
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). 1996. The North Atlantic Treaty of 1949. The Nato Handbook. Nato Web Archive, online version. 1–4. http:www.nato.intdocuhandbook.Google Scholar
Norden, Deborah. 1990. Democratic Consolidation and Military Professionalism: Argentina in the 1980s. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 32, 3 (Fall): 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1994a. Argentina-Brasil: medidas bilaterales de fortalecimiento de la confianza mutua. Doc. 7/94 (March 15): 119.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1994b. Exposición del gobierno de la República Argentina sobre puntos del temario de la reunión de expertos sobre medidas de fomento de la confianza y mecanismos de seguridad en la región. Doc. 29/94 (March 15): 110.Google Scholar
Pache, Carlos P. 1995. Uruguayan Air Force officers. Author interviews. Montevideo, November.Google Scholar
El País (Montivideo) Online. 1997a. Iturria descartó integración de fuerzas armadas del Mercosur. http:diarioelpais.com. (May 21): 12.Google Scholar
El País (Montivideo) Online. 1997b. Uruguay ratifica oposición a ampliar cometido de Ffaa. June 29: 1.Google Scholar
El País (Montivideo) Online. 1997c. Ministro de defensa ratifica que Ffaa seguirán participando en operativos. July 25: 1.Google Scholar
El País (Montivideo) Online. 1997d. Iturria reconoció que el ejército no vigila la frontera porque es extensa. August 12: 1.Google Scholar
Patiño Mayer, H. 1994. Punto 4: la Oea y la seguridad hemisférica: análisis y perspectivas. Organización de los Estados Americanos, reunión de expertos sobre medidas de fomento de la confianza y mecanismos de seguridad en la región. Washington, Dc: Oas. Doc. 29/94 (March 15): 124.Google Scholar
Peña, Félix. 1993. Strategies for Macroeconomic Coordination: Reflections on the Case of MERCOSUR. In The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas, ed. Peter, H. Smith. New Brunswick : Transaction. 183–99.Google Scholar
Pérez Yoma, Edmundo. 1997. Los desafíos de seguridad y defensa en el Cono Sur. Ser en el 2000 Online Database (April 1): 1.Google Scholar
Perry, William, and Max, Primorac. 1994. The Inter-American Security Agenda. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 36, 3 (Fall): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1991. Between Confrontation and Accommodation: Military and Government Policy in Democratic Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies 23, 3 (October): 543–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1997. Through Corridors of Power: Institutions and Civil-Military Relations in Argentina. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1998. From Confrontation to Cooperation: Democratic Governance and Argentine Foreign Relations. In Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe, ed. David, R. Mares. Boulder : Westview Press. 79100.Google Scholar
Rial, J. 1995. Actitud de las fuerzas armadas del Mercosur. Revista Seguridad Estratégica Regional 7 (March: 1416.Google Scholar
Rojas Aravena, Francisco. 1994. Chile y el gasto militar: un criterio histórico y jurídico de asignación. In Gasto militar en América Latina: procesos de decisiones y actores claves, ed. Rojas, Aravena. Santiago, Chile : FLACSO. 239–77.Google Scholar
Rojas Aravena, Francisco. 1998. Confidence Building Measures and Strategic Balance: a Step toward Expansion and Stability. In Strategic Balance and Confidence Building Measures in the Americas, ed. Joseph, S. Tulchin and.Google Scholar
Rojas Aravena, Francisco, and William, C. Smith, eds. 1994. El Cono Sur y las transformaciones globales. Santiago : FLACSO/North South Center.Google Scholar
Scheetz, Thomas. 1998. Research Economist, Centra de Investigaciones Europeo-Latinoamericanas (Eural), Buenos Aires. Personal communication. November.Google Scholar
Schoultz, Lars, William, C. Smith, and Augusto, Varas, eds. 1994. Security, Democracy, and Development in U.S.-Latin American Relations. New Brunswick : Transaction.Google Scholar
Ser en el 2000 Online Database on Security and Defense. Buenos Aires: Revista Seguridad Estratégica Regional.Google Scholar
Solingen, E. 1996. Industrial Policy, Technology, and International Bargaining: Designing Nuclear Industries in Argentina and Brazil. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sondrol, Paul C. 1992. The Emerging New Politics of Liberalizing Paraguay: Sustained Civil-Military Control without Democracy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 34, 2 (Summer): 127–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sus Sucesos, Agencia de Noticias de Mercosur. 1998. http:www.mercosur.org.Google Scholar
TELAM Noticias (Argentine News Agency). 1997. Mercosur Member Countries Start Joint Military Exercises in Brazil. Global Newsbank. October 7. http:www.neu.edugatewaydbasesaboutgn.htm.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1997. Paraguay: the Coup that Didn’t Happen. Journal of Democracy 8, 1: 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varas, Augusto. 1993. La pós–guerra fría, la seguridad hemisférica y la defensa nacional. In Percepciones de amenaza y política de defensa en América Latina, ed. Varas, and Cruz, Johnson. Santiago, Chile : FLACSO. 169.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto, James, A. Schear, and Lisa, Owens, eds. 1995. Confidence-building Measures in Latin America. Santiago : FLACSO.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Gilberto, Colonel, 1997. Mercosur and Subcontinental Security: Repercussions within the Armed Forces. Paper presented at the 10th Mercosur Joint Staffs and Defense Strategic Studies Symposium, Montevideo, June. Quoted in Uruguay: Military Leaders, Defense Minister Participate in Symposium, Fbis-Lat Online, June 30: 1–2. http:wnc.fedworld.gov.Google Scholar
Vieira, G., General, 1994. La variable estratégica en el proceso de constitución del Mercosur. Revista Seguridad Estratégica Regional 5 (March: 813.Google Scholar