Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T17:39:59.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

H. R. Cooper ,
S. P. Burrell ,
R. H. Powell ,
D. W. Proops  and
J. A. Bickerton
H. R. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
S. P. Burrell
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
R. H. Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
D. W. Proops
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
J. A. Bickerton
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid team is part of the Birmingham osseointegrated programme. In the first seven years of its existence it has received 309 referrals. Twenty-six per cent had suffered a congenital conductive hearing loss and 74 per cent had an acquired conductive hearing loss; the majority secondary to chronic suppurative otitis media.

This report is of 68 out of 106 adults wearing bone anchored hearing aids (BAHAs). Ninety-eight per cent showed audiological improvement with the congenital group demonstrating marginally the best freefield thresholds and speech discrimination. Questionnaire data as to the patient experience confirms the benefits especially hearing in noise, and comfort, and the vast majority were more satisfied with the bone anchored hearing aid than their previous aid.

Keywords

Hearing aids, bone anchoredAudiologyOutcome and process assessment (health care)
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Supplement 21 , December 1996 , pp. 13 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branemark, P. I., Breine, U., Adell, R., Hanson, B. O., Lindstrom, J., Ohlsson, A. (1969) Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 3: 81–100.Google Scholar
Cremers, C. W. R. J., Snik, A. F. M., Beynon, A. J. (1992) Hearing with a bone anchored hearing and (BAHA HC200) compared to conventional bone conduction hearing aids. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakansson, B., Liden, B., Tjëllström, A., Ringdahl, A., Jacobsson, M., Carlsson, P., Erlandsson, B. E. (1990) Ten years experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 99 (suppl 151): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hakansson, B., Tjllström, A., Rosenhall, U., Carlsson, P. (1985) The bone anchored hearing aid: principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) 100: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylanus, E. A. M., Snik, A. F. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J., Jorritsma, F. F., Verschuure, I. H. (1994a) Audiological results of the Bone Anchored Hearing Aid HC200, Multicentre results. Annals of Otolaryngology, Rhinology and Laryngology 102: 368–374.Google Scholar
Mylanus, E. A. M., Snik, A. F. M., Jorritsma, F. F., Cremers, C. W. R. J. (1994b) Audiological results of the bone anchored hearing aid HC200. Ear and Hearing 15: 87–92.Google Scholar
Mylanus, E. A. M., Snik, A. F. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J. (1995) The bone anchored versus conventional hearing aids: the patients opinion. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 121: 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snik, A. F. M., Jorritsma, F. F., Cremers, C. W. R. J., Beynon, A. J., van den Berge, N. W. (1992) The Superbass bone anchored hearing aid compared to conventional hearing aids: Audiological results and patients' opinions. Scandinavian Audiology 21: 157–161.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. S., Proops, D. W., Wake, M. J. C., Deadman, M. J., Worrollo, S., Hobson, J. A. (1993) Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: The initial Birmingham Experience. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 107: 502–509.Google Scholar
Tjëllström, A., Jacobsson, M., Norvell, B., Albrektsson, T. (1992) Patients' attitude to the bone anchored hearing aid: results of a questionnaire study. Scandinavian Audiology 21: 157–161.Google Scholar
Tjëllström, A., Rosenhall, U., Lindstrom, J., Hallen, O., Albrektsson, T., Branemark, P. I. (1983) Five years experience with the skin penetrating bone anchored implants in the temporal bone. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) 95: 568–575.Google Scholar