Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:02:41.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cochlear implant extrusion in a young child — a preventative procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

H. C. Harrison ,
W. P. R. Gibson  and
P. G. Thompson
H. C. Harrison*
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia.
W. P. R. Gibson
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia.
P. G. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: H. C. Harrison, 135 Macquarie Street, Sydney, 2000, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A Cochlear Mini System 22 Channel cochlear implant extruded through the skin of a young girl. The implant was saved by use of a transposition flap. Extrusion appeared to be due to pressure necrosis from the implant on the overlying tissues. It is believed that this problem can be prevented by angulation of the implant before insertion so that it conforms to the curvature of the skull, so avoiding pressure on the tissues. The method of angulation is described.

Keywords

Cochlear implantcomplications
Type
Clinical Records
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 109 , Issue 5 , May 1995 , pp. 425 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lehnhardt, E., Hirshorn, M. S. (1986) Quoted by Webb, R. L., Lehnhardt, E., Clark, G. M., Laszig, R., Pyman, B. C., Franz, K. H. (1991) Surgical complications with the Cochlear multiple-channel intracochlear implant: experience at Hannover and Melbourne. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 100: 131–138.Google Scholar