Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T01:17:26.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deliberate self-harming application of superglue in the nose: case report and literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2015

T Tikka ,
J Al Abduwani  and
D Costello
T Tikka*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
J Al Abduwani
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
D Costello
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Theofano Tikka, ENT Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK E-mail: Theofano.tikka@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Accidental and non-accidental applications of superglue in the ear, nose and oral cavity have been reported previously. Surgical removal of glue from the nose is the current practice.

Case report:

This paper reports the case of an 18-year-old female, who presented with complete bilateral nasal occlusion due to deliberate self-application of superglue in both nostrils to avoid nasogastric tube insertion.

Results:

Removal of glue was accomplished with a combination of local anaesthetic cream and acetone-soaked cotton buds, which caused only minimal discomfort to the patient. All traces of glue disappeared within 10 days, without causing damage to the nasal mucosa, nasal blockage or pain.

Conclusion:

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of deliberate self-application of superglue in the nose. A successful non-surgical management option for the removal of glue from the nose is introduced.

Keywords

GluesNoseAcetoneAnesthetics, LocalDeliberate Self-Harm
Type
Clinical Records
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 129 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 98 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Abadir, WF, Nakhla, V, Chong, R. Removal of superglue from the external ear using acetone: case report and literature review. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:1219–21Google Scholar
2Persaud, R. A novel approach to the removal of superglue from the ear. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:901–2Google Scholar
3Pollock, HD. Glue ear – cyanoacrylic. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:1188Google Scholar
4White, SJ, Broner, S. The use of acetone to dissolve a Styrofoam impaction of the ear. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:580–2Google Scholar
5Wight, RG, Bull, PD. ‘Superglue ear’. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:706–7Google Scholar
6Anusha, B, Purushotman, R, Lina, LC, Avatar, S. Superglue accidentally used as ear drops. Med J Malaysia 2012;67:12–13Google Scholar
7Ogunleye, AO. Cyanoacrylate (superglue) presenting as an otic foreign body. West Afr J Med 2002;21:159–60Google ScholarPubMed
8Dimitriadis, PA, Rourke, T, Colquhoun-Flannery, W, Herdman, R, Corbridge, RJ. Superglue ear: our experience and a review of the literature. B-ENT 2013;9:325–8Google Scholar
9Stasche, N, Behrndt, W, Bärmann, M. Therapeutic options after the accidental application of cyanacrylate into the outer ear canal [in German]. HNO 2008;56:541–4Google Scholar
10Duvvi, SK, Lo, S, Kumar, R, Spraggs, PD. Superglue (cyanoacrylate) in the nose. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:803–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Sira, J, Uppal, S, Dezso, A. Cyanoacrylate (“superglue”) injury to the nasal cavity: case report and a proposed management algorithm. Ear Nose Throat J 2011;90:26–8Google Scholar
12Cousin, GC. Accidental application of cyanoacrylate to the mouth. Br Dent J 1990;169:293–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Narendranath, R. How to remove Superglue from the mouth: case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;43:81–2Google Scholar
14Matos-Pérez, CR, White, JD, Wilker, JJ. Polymer composition and substrate influences on the adhesive bonding of a biomimetic, cross-linking polymer. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:9498–505Google Scholar
15Morgan, SJ, Astbury, NJ. Inadvertent self-administration of superglue: a consumer hazard. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;289:226–7Google Scholar
16Bot, GM, Bot, KG, Ogunranti, JO, Onah, JA, Sule, AZ, Hassan, I et al. The use of cyanoacrylate in surgical anastomosis: an alternative to microsurgery. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2010;2:44–8Google Scholar
17Chintamani, , Mehrotra, M, Kulshreshtha, P, Jha, BP, Bhatnagar, D. ‘Superglue’: a novel approach in the management of faecal fistulae. Trop Doct 2007;37:147–8Google Scholar
18Tan, HL, Nah, SA, Budianto, II, Sehat, S, Tamba, R. The use of octyl cyanoacrylate (superglue) in hypospadias repair including its use as a fixator for urethral stents. J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:2294–7Google Scholar
19Vishwanathan, H, Hamilton, DW, Ibrahim, E, Youssef, H, Pahor, AL. Superglue in otology. Surgeon 2007;5:10–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Nishimoto, S, Oyama, T, Fukuda, K, Kawai, K, Kakibuchi, M. Usage of absorbable thread and superglue for building chondral framework in auricular reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:300–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Albert, RR, Job, A. Cyanoacrylate in myringoplasty - an office based procedure. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;56:133–5Google Scholar
22Picton-Robinson, I. Danger of instant adhesives. Br Med J 1977;2:581–2Google Scholar
23Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Acetone, 1994. In: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp21.pdf [28 May 2014]Google Scholar
24Wigaeus, E, Holm, S, Astrand, I. Exposure to acetone: uptake and elimination in man. Scand J Work Environ Health 1981;7:84–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Haggard, HW, Greenberg, LA, Turner, JM. The physiological principles governing the action of acetone together with determination of toxicity. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1944;26:133–51Google Scholar
26European Commission. Recommendation from the Scientific Expert Group on Occupational Exposure Limits for acetone, 1997. In: http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6799&langId=en [29 May 2014]Google Scholar
27Wysocki, CJ, Dalton, P, Brody, MJ, Lawley, HJ. Acetone odor and irritation thresholds obtained from acetone-exposed factory workers and from control (occupationally unexposed) subjects. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997;58(suppl 10):704–12Google Scholar
28Landahl, HD, Herrmann, RG. Retention of vapors and gases in the human nose and lung. Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med 1950;1:36–45Google Scholar
29Gitelson, S, Werczberger, A, Herman, JR. Coma and hyperglycemia following drinking of acetone. Diabetes 1966;15:810–11Google Scholar
30Raleigh, RL, McGee, WA. Effects of short, high-concentration exposures to acetone as determined by observation in the work area. J Occup Med 1972;14:607–10Google Scholar
31Ross, DJ. Acute acetone intoxication involving eight male workers. Ann Occup Hyg 1973;16:73–5Google Scholar