Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:35:49.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Treatment of Enlarged or Diseased Tonsils in Cases where Surgical Procedures are Contra-Indicated1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

Irwin Moore
Irwin Moore
Affiliation:
Surgeon to the Throat Hospital, Golden Square, London, W
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology, Rhinology, and Otology , Volume 34 , Issue 10 , October 1919 , pp. 387 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Paper read at the Summer Congress of the Laryngological Section of the Royal Society of Medicine, May 2, 1919.

References

Ashby, Hugh.—“The Cause of the Enlarged Tonsils and Adenoids in Children and their Treatment with Lymphatic Gland Extract,” Brit. Med. Journ., 1913, i, p. 1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béck, Joseph C. (Chicago).—“Salient Facts regarding Tonsils in Children and Adults,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1917, xxvi, p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, G. W. (Chicago).—“The Tonsil Question in Children,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1917, xxvi, p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, F. H. (New York).—“Dis. Throat and Nose,” 1st edit., N.Y., 1881, p. 135.Google Scholar
Crowe, S. J., Watkins, S. S. and Rothholtz, Alma S. (Baltimore).—“Relation of Tonsil and Naso-Pharyngeal Infections to Geleral Systemic Disorders,” Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 1917, xxviii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Cumberbatch, E. P.—“Surgical Diathermy,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1918, xi (Sect. Electro.-Ther.), pp. 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delavan, D. Bryson (New York).—“Skiagraphy in Diagnosis of Enlargements of the Thymus Glands,” Trans. Amer. Laryngol. Assoc., 1914, p. 70.Google Scholar
Eaton, F. B. (Portland, U.S.A.).—“The Present State of the Galvano-cautery in the Treatment of the Upper Air-passages,” Journ. Of Laryngol., Rhinol., and Otol., 1888, ii, p. 131.Google Scholar
Fournié, (Paris).—“.Étude Pratique sur le Laryngoscope et sur l'application des remédes topiques d'uns les voies respiratories.Étude,” 1863, p. 54.Google Scholar
French, Thomas R. (New York).—“Tonsillotomy versus Tonsillectomy,” New York Med. Journ., 1914, c, pp. 1097–1103.Google Scholar
Goodale, Joseph L. (Boston).—“The Treatment of Inoperable Tonsillar Hypertrophy by Interstitial Injections of Silver Nitrate,” Trans. Amer. Laryngol. Assoc., 1908, p. 43;Google Scholar
Goodale, Joseph L. (Boston).—“Indications for and Relative Values of Tonsillotomy and Tonsillectomy,” Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., 1913, c1xix, pp. 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazzi, Vittorio (Pisa).—Cited by Watson, Williams, Med. Ann., 1893, p. 509.Google Scholar
Hall, Havilland.—Discussion on Tilley's, Case of “Enlarged Tonsil Treated by Galvano puncture,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1913, v (Sect. Laryngol.), p. 31.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. K. (Adelaide).—“The Faucial Tonsils and their Relation to various Local and General Diseased Conditions,” Austral. Med. Journ., 1910, xv, p. 329.Google Scholar
Harmer, Douglas.—“The Treatment of Malignant Growths of the Mouth and Pharynx by Diathermy,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1912, v (Sect. Laryngol.), p. 145Google Scholar
op. cit. 1911, iv (Sect. Electro-Therap.), p. 8.Google Scholar
Kelson, W. H.—Discussion on Tilley's, case, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1913, v (Sect. Laryngol.), p. 32.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Morell.—“On Enlarged Tonsils and their Treatment without Cutting,” Med. Mirror, 1864, i, pp. 465 and 522.Google Scholar
“Dis. Throat and Nose,” 1880.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Dan.—“Some Hints on the Tonsil-adenoid Operation,” Practitioner, 1917, p. 109;Google Scholar
McKenzie, Dan.—discussion on Cumberbach's, E. P. paper, “Surgical Diathermy,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1918, xi (Sect. Electro-Therap.), p. 46.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J. D.—“On the Probable Cause of Fatalities at the Tonsil-adenoid Operation,” Practitioner, 1917, icix, p. 482.Google Scholar
Moore, Irwin.—Discussion on Tilley's, case of “Enlarged Tonsils Treated by Galvano-puncture,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1913, vi (Sect. Laryngol.), p. 33.Google Scholar
Patterson, Norman.—Discussion on cumberbatch's, E. P. paper, “Surgical Diathermy,” proc. Roy. Soc. Med, 1918, xi (Sect. Electro-Therap.), p. 44.Google Scholar
Potter, F. H. (Buffalo, U.S.A.).—“The Galvano-cautery in the Treatment of Enlarged Tonsils,” Med. News, Philad., 03 10, 1888.Google Scholar
Potter, F. H. (Buffalo, U.S.A.).—abstract, Journ. of Laryngol., Rhinol., and Otol., 1888, ii, p. 238.Google Scholar
Powell, Fitzgerald.—Discussion on Tilley's, case, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1913, v (Sect Laryngol.), p. 32.Google Scholar
Richards, Geo. L. (Fall River, Mass.).—“The Present State of the Tonsil Operation,” Trans. Amer. Larngol., Rhinol., and Otol. Soc., 1909, p. 162.Google Scholar
Ruppaner, A. (New York).—“On the Removal of Enlarged Tonsils without cutting, with 132 Cases,” Med. and Surg. Rep. (Phil.), 1869, xxi, p. 311.Google Scholar
Semon, Felix.—Discussion on Tilley's, Case Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1913, v (Sect. Laryngol.), p. 31.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, Geo. E. (Chicago).—“Clinical Problems Relating to the Faucial Tonsils in Adults,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., xxvi, p. 135.Google Scholar
Shurley, Ernest L. (Detroit).—“Dis. of Nose and Throat,” 1900.Google Scholar
Shurly, B. R. (Detroit).—“Enucleatino of the Faucial Tonsils: Its Difficulties and Contra-indications,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1910, lv, p. 1527.Google Scholar
Solis-Cohen, J. (Philadelphia).—“Dis. Throat,” 1st edit., N.Y. 1872, p. 132.Google Scholar
Smith, W. J.—“The Treatment of Enlarged Tonsils at any Period of Life without the Operation of Excision,” Brit. Med. Journ., 1865, ii, p. 636.Google Scholar
Stewart, W.—“The Treatment of Adenoids and Enlarged Tonsils without Operation,” Brit. Med. Journ., 1913, ii, p. 1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Henry L. (Newhaen, U.S.A.).—“Are the Tonsils a Menace or a Protection?” Ann Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1911, xx, p. 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, Herbert.—“Very Large Tonsil in an Elderly person Reduced almost to Complete Disappearance by Galvano-puncture,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1913, v (Sect. Laryngol.), p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tussaud, (Paris).—Lyon Méd., 1894, 1xxv, p. 541Google Scholar
Cited by Watson, Williams, Met. Ann., 1895, p. 479.Google Scholar
Valat, (Paris).—Gaz. des. Hôp., 00 17, 1888;Google Scholar
Valat, (Paris).—abstract, Journ. of Laryngol., Rhinol., and Otol., 1889, iii, p. 23.Google Scholar
Welton, Carrol B. (Illinois).—“The Tonsil Operation and Indications which Require it,” New York Med. Journ., 1918, cviii, p. 98.Google Scholar
Whillis, Samuel S., and Frederick, C. Pybus.—“On the Enucleation of Tonsils with the Guillotine,” Brit. Med. Journ., 1911, ii, p. 1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Watson.—Med. Ann., 1890, p. 483;Google Scholar
Williams, Watson. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1913, v (Sect. laryngol.), p. 31.Google Scholar
Wright, Jonathan (Brooklyn).—“The Galvano-cautery in the Treatment of Enlarged Tonsil,” Med. News, 03 24, 1888.Google Scholar
Wright, Jonathan (Brooklyn).—Abstract, Journ. of Laryngol., Rhinol., and Otol., 1888, ii, p. 303.Google Scholar
Wright, George H. (Boston).—“A Functional Relation of the Tonsil to the Teeth,” Bost. Med. and Surg. Journ., 1909, clx, pp. 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar