Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:25:54.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Closure of tympanic membrane perforation after the removal of Goode-type tympanostomy tubes: the use of silastic sheeting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. G. Courteney-Harris ,
G. R. Ford ,
T. M. J. Ganiwalla  and
K. S. Mangat
R. G. Courteney-Harris*
Affiliation:
Norwich
G. R. Ford
Affiliation:
Norwich
T. M. J. Ganiwalla
Affiliation:
Norwich
K. S. Mangat
Affiliation:
Norwich
*
ENT Department, The Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, Norwich NR1 2SR.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The reported incidence of persistent tympanic membrane perforation after the extrusion or removal of Goodetype tympanostomy tubes varies from 3 per cent to 47.5 per cent.

A prospective randomized study of 152 Goode-type T-tube removals is presented. In one group of 79 ears, the edge of the defect was just freshened, but in the other 73 ears, the edge was freshened and a small piece of 0.13 mm silastic sheeting placed over the defect. Follow-up was performed at six weeks and three, six and nine months and shows that the use of silastic sheeting increases the rate of closure of the perforation and also significantly decreases the number of persistent perforations at nine months.

Keywords

Tympanic membraneperforationTympanostomy tuberemoval
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 106 , Issue 11 , November 1992 , pp. 960 - 962
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brockbank, M. J., Jonathan, D. A., Grant, H. R., Wright, A. (1988) Goode T-tubes: Do the benefits of their use outweigh their complications? Clinical Otolaryngology, 13, 351–356.Google Scholar
Chevretton, E., Bingham, B. J. G., Firman, E. (1987) The prevention of tympanic membrane perforation following the removal of long-term Paparella Type II ventilation tubes. Clinical Otolaryngology, 12, 377–381.Google Scholar
Curley, J. W. A. (1986) Grommet insertion: Some basic questions answered. Clinical Otolaryngology, 11, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goode, R. L. (1983) Advantages of the T-tube for short and longterm middle ear ventilation. Laryngoscopy, 93, 376–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, M. R., Parker, A. J. (1988) Perforations of the tympanic membrane following the use of Goode-type ‘Long-term’ tympanostomy tubes. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 102, 997–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, L. A., Warder, F. R., Hudson, W. R. (1974) Complications of tympanostomy tubes. Archives of Otolaryngology, 100, 151–154.Google Scholar
Matt, B. H., Miller, R. P., Meyers, R. M., Campbell, J. M., Cotton, R. T. (1991) Incidence of perforation with Goode T-tube. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 21: 1–6.Google Scholar
McLelland, C. A. (1980) Incidence of complications from use of tympanostomy tubes. Archives of Otolaryngology, 196, 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothera, M. P., Grant, H. R. (1985) Long-term ventilation of the middle ear using the Goode T-tube. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 99, 335–337.Google Scholar
Skinner, D. W., Lesser, T. H. J., Richards, S. H. (1988) A 15 year follow-up of a controlled trial of the use of grommets in glue ear. Clinical Otolaryngology, 13, 341–346.Google Scholar
Von Schoenberg, M., Wengraf, C. L., Gleeson, M. (1989) Results of middle ear ventilation with Goode's Tubes. Clinical Otolaryngology, 14, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weigel, M. T., Parker, M. Y., Goldsmith, M. M., Postma, D. S., Pillsbury, H. C. (1989) A prospective randomized study of four commonly used tympanostomy tubes. Laryngoscope, 99, 252–256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed