Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T23:24:39.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiofrequency thermal ablation versus ‘cold steel’ for supra-auricular excision of preauricular sinus: comparative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2010

H Bajwa  and
S Kumar
H Bajwa
Affiliation:
Department of ENT-Head and Neck Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India
S Kumar*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT-Head and Neck Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Sunil Kumar, A-602, Harmony Aptt, Plot 6-B, Sector 23, Dwarka, Delhi 110075, India. E-mail: suku321@rediffmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the results of radiofrequency thermal ablation versus ‘cold steel’ excision, for supra-auricular excision of preauricular sinus.

Study design:

Prospective study. Observations included recurrence, intra-operative bleeding, operation time and ease of dissection.

Setting:

Tertiary referral hospital.

Subjects and methods:

Sixty cases of preauricular sinus were assigned randomly to two groups (30 cases each). Group one patients underwent cold steel sinus excision, whereas group two patients underwent radiofrequency-assisted sinus excision.

Results:

Fifty patients were operated upon, with a mean age of 12.26 years. Most patients were aged between zero and five years (40 per cent). The average patient follow-up time was 15 months (range, six to 24 months). Recurrence rates were 23 per cent in group one and 3 per cent in group two; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.016). Dissection of the sinus tract was reported to be much easier in the radiofrequency group, compared with the cold steel group (p = 0.023), with minimal bleeding.

Conclusion:

From our observations, radiofrequency-assisted, local, wide excision appears to be preferable for treatment of preauricular sinus, compared with cold steel excision, as it allows better peri-operative visualisation, easier dissection, minimal bleeding and a lower subsequent recurrence rate (3.3 per cent).

Keywords

Ear Diseases, CongenitalEar Diseases, SurgeryFistula, SurgeryRecurrence
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 124 , Issue 11 , November 2010 , pp. 1190 - 1193
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tan, T, Constantinides, H, Mitchell, TE. The preauricular sinus: a review of its aetiology, clinical presentation and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1469–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Scheinfeld, NS, Silverberg, NB, Weinberg, JM, Nozad, V. The preauricular sinus: a review of its clinical presentation, treatment and associations. Pediatr Dermatol 2004;21:191–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Gur, E, Yeung, A, Al-Azzawi, M, Thomson, H. The excised preauricular sinus in 14 years of experience: is there a problem? Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1405–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Prasad, S, Grundfast, K, Milmoe, G. Management of congenital preauricular pit and sinus tract in children. Laryngoscope 1990;100:320–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Kumar, KK, Narayanamurthy, VB, Sumathi, V, Vijay, R. Preauricular sinus: operating microscope improves outcome. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;58:6–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Leopardi, G, Chiarella, G, Conti, S, Cassandro, E. Surgical treatment of recurring preauricular sinus: supra-auricular approach. Acta Otorhinolarygol Ital 2008;28:302–5Google ScholarPubMed
7 Back, L, Paloheimo, M, Ylikoski, J. Traditional tonsillectomy compared with bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation tonsillectomy in adults. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1106–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Back, LJ, Hytonen, ML, Malmerz, HO, Yilkoski, JS. Submucosal bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation of inferior turbinates; a long term follow up with subjective and objective assessment. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1806–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Wedman, J, Miljeteig, H. Treatment of simple snoring using radio waves for ablation of uvula and soft palate: a day-case surgery procedure. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1256–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Currie, AR, King, WWK, Vlantis, AC, Li, AKC. Pitfalls in the management of preauricular sinuses. Br J Surg 1996;83:1722–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Haghighi, M. The effect of tranexamic acid on bleeding during lumbar laminectomy. Medical Journal of the Iranian Red Crescent 2006;8:46–50Google Scholar
12 Emery, PJ, Salama, NY. Congenital preauricular sinus: a study of 31 cases seen over a 10-year period. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1981;3:205–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Lau, JTK. Towards better delineation and complete excision of preauricular sinus. Aust N Z J Surg 1983;53:267–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Martin-Granzo, R, Pervez Herrero, MC, Sanchez-Cueller, A. Methylene blue staining and probing for fistula resection: application in a case of bilateral congenital preauricular fistula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:439–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Ahuja, AT, Marshall, JN, Roebuck, DJ, King, AD, Metreweli, C. Sonographic appearances of preauricular sinus. Clin Radiol 2000;55:528–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Lam, HCK, Soo, G, Wormald, PJ, Van Hasselt, CA. Excision of the preauricular sinus: a comparison of two surgical techniques. Laryngoscope 2001;111:317–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Gupta, PJ. Radiofrequency “suture less” fistulotomy – a new way of treating fistula in anus. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2003;9:1082–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Gupta, PJ. Anal fistulotomy with radiofrequency. Dig Surg 2004;21:72–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Powell, NB, Riley, RW, Troell, RJ, Li, K, Blumen, MB, Guilleminault, C. Radiofrequency volumetric reduction of the tongue. Chest 1997;111:1348–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed