Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:53:31.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WHO shows it cares about hearing loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2013

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013

It is not often that ENT topics are the leading stories on the World Health Organization (WHO) website, but with the publication of new prevalence data on hearing loss, to coincide with International Ear Care Day (1 March 2013), this has indeed happened.1 These new data reveal greatly increased figures for hearing loss. There are an estimated 360 million people with disabling hearing loss worldwide (5.3 per cent of the world's population). The prevalence of disabling hearing loss is highest in the South Asia, Asia Pacific and Sub-Saharan African regions. Approximately one-third of people over 65 years of age are affected by disabling hearing loss. In younger persons, ototoxicity is a much overlooked cause of hearing loss in low and middle income countries, where resources for monitoring serum drug levels and audiometry often do not exist.Reference Harris, Peer and Fagan2, Reference Fagan3

In last month's issue, we highlighted the hidden effects of environmental noise, particularly that generated by wind turbines.Reference Youngs and Fisher4, Reference Farboud, Crunkhorn and Trinidade5 The major contributors to environmental noise remain road traffic and aviation. The United Kingdom's Department for Transport recently drafted an Aviation Policy Framework for the UK, which seeks to balance economic and environmental considerations.Reference Banatvala and Roa6 Such initiatives emphasise the fact that environmental noise is a major public health issue which requires greater awareness.

In this issue, a number of articles focus on important aspects of tonsillectomy. There is increasing pressure on surgeons to carry out tonsillectomy as a day-case procedure. Clement reports that children's eligibility for tonsillectomy with same-day discharge has increased, and that there is an association between deprivation and tonsillectomy.Reference Clement7 Those wishing to justify tonsillectomy on quality of life grounds can refer to the systematic review by Andreou and colleagues, who conclude that the effects are likely to be long-lasting and to have a greater impact on younger patients.Reference Andreou, Hadjisymeou and Panesar8 Finally, following their randomised, controlled trial El-Fattah and Ramzy report that pre-emptive triple analgesia is effective for the control of post-tonsillectomy pain in children.Reference El-Fattah and Ramzy9

References

1International Ear Care Day. World Health Organization. In: http://www.who.int/en/ [1 March 2013]Google Scholar
2Harris, T, Peer, S, Fagan, JJ. Audiological monitoring for ototoxic tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus and cancer therapies in a developing world setting. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:548–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Fagan, JJ. Developing world ENT: a global responsibility. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:544–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Youngs, R, Fisher, E. The hidden effects of environmental noise. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Farboud, A, Crunkhorn, R, Trinidade, A. ‘Wind turbine syndrome’: fact or fiction? J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:222–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Banatvala, J, Roa, M. Aviation and public health. BMJ 2013;346:f593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Clement, WA. Day-case tonsillectomy for children in Glasgow: the impact of changing indications and deprivation. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:392–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Andreou, N, Hadjisymeou, S, Panesar, J. Does tonsillectomy improve quality of life in adults? A systematic literature review. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:332–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9El-Fattah, AMA, Ramzy, E. Pre-emptive triple analgesia protocol for tonsillectomy pain control in children: double-blind, randomised, controlled, clinical trial. J Laryngol Otol 2013:127:383–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed