Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:52:17.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elections and Political Participation in Nineteenth-Century Peru: The 1871–72 Presidential Campaign

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2001

ULRICH MÜCKE
Affiliation:
Erfurt University

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between elections and political participation in nineteenth-century Peru. Focusing on the elections of 1871–72, I argue that for a better understanding of the way elections facilitated political participation, we should consider not only the vote itself but also analyse the extensive electoral campaign. Generally, voting was irregular, as the different political factions attempted to impede the participation of their opponents through violence. To win the violent clashes on election day it was necessary to mobilise the popular classes. Especially in the cities, corruption and patron–client ties alone proved to be insufficient to gain support. To build powerful political factions, candidates had to win public opinion through massive campaigning and they had to respond to the claims of the urban middle and lower classes. All factions engaged in electoral fraud and neither the government nor any other political actor could determine the electoral outcome. Strong political factions were able to counterbalance governmental interference. That is why, in 1872, a government-opposed candidate, Manuel Pardo, was able to win the presidential election.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based upon chapter 3.1. of my PhD thesis, published as Der Partido Civil in Peru. 1871–1879. Zur Geschichte politischer Parteien und Repräsentation in Lateinamerika (Stuttgart, 1998). I thank Horst Pietschmann, Nils Jacobsen and Thomas Krüggeler for their invaluable comments and the German Academic Exchange Service and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for financial support.