Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
For the past couple of decades the Latin Americans, like their brethren in Africa and Asia, have been hell-bent in search of ‘development’ or ‘modernization’. While the Latin Americans were on the firing line, scholars and policy-makers in both the rich nations and the poor nations were involved in setting out an intellectual framework for analyzing the developmental process. New concepts to explain the meaning of development were devised; innovative measurements to gauge the level of development were proposed; a new vocabulary to capture the nuances of development was put forth.
1 A, Gabriel A. and Powell, G. Bingham, Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (Boston, Little, Brown, 1966), p. 24.Google Scholar
2 For the quotations and concomitant discussion, see B, Juan B., Bases y Puntos de Partida para la Organizacicón Politica de la República Argentina (Buenos Aires, Talleres Gráficos Argentinos L. J. Rosso, 1933), pp. 212–13, 89, 93;Google ScholarAlberdi, , ‘The United States as a Model for South America’, in Fredrick, B. Pike (ed.), Latin American History Select Problems (New York, Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., 1969), p. 205;Google ScholarSimón, Bolívar, ‘Jamaica Letter’, Selected Writings of Bolivar, vol. I, Harold, A. Bierck Jr (ed.) (published by Banco de Venezuela, New York, Colonial Press, 1951), p. 115;Google ScholarMiguel, Jorrin and John, D. Martz, Latin American Political Thought and Ideology (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1970), p. 72;Google Scholar and Leopoldo, Zea, The Latin American Mind (Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1963), pp. 45, 56.Google Scholar
3 For the quotations and Concomitant discussion, see Alberdi, , Bases y Puntos de Partida …, pp. 89, 93;Google ScholarCharles, C. Cumberland, Mexico: The Struggle for Modernity (New York, Oxford University Press, 1968), p. 194;Google Scholar and Jorrín, and Martz, , Latin American Political Thought …, p. 116.Google Scholar
4 Deustua, Alejandro O., ‘Race Mixture Viewed as a Source of Biological Deterioration ’, in Pike, (ed.), Latin American History …, p. 204.Google Scholar
5 Rómulo, Betancourt, Posición y Doctrina (Caracas, Editorial Cordillera, 1958), pp. 149–50.Google Scholar
6 Quoted in Jorrín, and Martz, , Latin American Political Thought …, p. 228.Google Scholar
7 Zea, , The Latin American Mind, p. 30.Google Scholar
8 Marina, Bandeira, ‘Mass Communications’, in Samuel, Shapiro (ed.), Integration of Man and Society in Latin America (Notre Dame, Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press, 1967), p. 143.Google Scholar
9 See ‘Children Are the Revolution ’, Saturday Review (1 04. 1972), pp. 54–8.Google Scholar
10 On Miranda, see Víctor, Andrés Belaúnde, Bolívar and the Political Thought of the Spanish American Reuolution (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1938), pp. 75–8.Google Scholar
11 Bolívar, , Selected Writings …, 1, 114–17, 118–20, 170–80, 190–1.Google Scholar
12 Quoted in Zea, , The Latin American Mind, p. 127; emphasis in Zea.Google Scholar
13 Bolívar, , Selected Writings …, 1, 175;Google Scholar and Alberdi, , Bases y Puntos de Partida …, pp. 210–12.Google Scholar
14 Zea, , The Latin American Mind, pp. 39–20.Google Scholar
15 For the quotations and concomitant discussion, see Stephen, Clissold, Latin America: A Cultural Outline (New York, Harper and Row, 1965), p. 98;Google ScholarCrawford, W. Rex, A Century of Latin American Thought (rev. ed.) (New York, Frederick A. Praeger, 1966), p. 263;Google Scholar and Alberto, José Vaccaro (ed.), Obras Completas de José Enrique Rodó (Buenos Aires, Ediciones Antonio Zamora, 1948), pp. 171, 207–8.Google Scholar
16 Octavio, Paz, The Labyrinth of Solitude (New York, Grove Press Inc., 1961), p. 175.Google Scholar
17 Patch, Richard W., ‘Peasantry and National Revolution: Bolivia’, in Silvert, K. H. (ed), Expectant Peoples: Nationalism and Development (New York, Random House, 1963), p. 100.Google Scholar
18 Clissold, , Latin America, p. 94Google Scholar
19 Cumberland, , Mexico, p. 258.Google Scholar
20 Ernesto, ‘Che’ Guevara, , Venceremos 1, John, Gerassi (ed.) (New York, Simon and Schuster, 1968), p. 105.Google Scholar
21 For a discussion of contemporary Catholicism's contribution to national integration, see my article ‘The Emergence of the Secular Nation-State and Latin American Catholicism’, Comparative Politics, 5, No. 2 (01., 1973), pp. 260–77.Google Scholar
22 Alberdi quoted in Crawford, , op. cit., pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
23 Lesley, Byrd Simpson, Many Mexicos (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1966), p. 261.Google Scholar
24 For the quotation, see Theodore, Geiger, The Conflicted Relationship (New York, McGraw Hill Book Co., 1967), p. 202.Google Scholar
25 Quoted in Harold, Eugene Davis, Government and Politics in Latin America (New York, The Ronald Press Co., 1958), p. 110.Google Scholar
26 See Siegel, Gilbert E., ‘The Strategy of Public Administration Reform: The Case of Brazil’, Public Administration Review (03 1966), pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
27 Quoted in Jorrín, and Martz, , Latin American Political Thought …, p. 307.Google Scholar
28 Urquidi, Victor L., The Challenge of Development in Latin America (New York, Frederick A. Praeger, 1964), pp. 88, 91.Google Scholar
29 Prebisch, , Change and Development, p. 201.Google Scholar
30 Albert, Hirschman, in Hirschman, (ed.), Latin American Issues: Essays and Comments (New York, Twentieth Century Fund, 1961).Google Scholar
