No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ideological Determinants of Citations to Supreme Court Precedent Across the Federal Judiciary
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2022
Abstract
How do ideological factors explain the citation patterns of federal courts? Current literature uses citation data in myriad ways but leaves open the question of how ideological factors may influence citation from each level of the judicial hierarchy differently. Combining original data on citations to Supreme Court opinions by district courts from 1969 to 2005 with existing data on citations by the courts of appeals and Supreme Court, I present a more complete portrait of the scope of a precedent across the federal judiciary. I find that ideological factors are associated with differences in citing behavior on the federal courts. Both the appellate and district courts are responsive to Supreme Court precedent, but district courts are not equally responsive to liberal and conservative updates to doctrine. Further, as the Supreme Court ideology changes from the time of setting precedent, appellate courts are less likely to cite the precedent, but district courts cite it more. These results suggest that the relationship between ideology and precedent adherence is complicated by the distinct institutional features of the Supreme Court, courts of appeals, and district courts.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association
References
Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. In Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, UCLA. 20: 07–2000.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1978. “Lower-court response to Supreme Court decisions: Reconsidering a negative picture.” The Justice System Journal 3 (3): 208–19.Google Scholar
Beim, Deborah, Hirsch, Alexander V., and Kastellec, Jonathan P.. 2016. “Signaling and counter-signaling in the judicial hierarchy: An empirical analysis of en banc review.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (2): 490–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C., and Reddick, Malia. 2002. “Overruled: An event history analysis of lower court reaction to Supreme Court alteration of precedent.” The Journal of Politics 64 (2): 534–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Stuart Minor, and Desmarais, Bruce A.. 2012. “Standing the test of time: The breadth of majority coalitions and the fate of us supreme court precedents.” Journal of Legal Analysis 4 (2): 445–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Stuart Minor, and Vanberg, Georg. 2016. “Judicial retirements and the staying power of US Supreme Court decisions.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 13 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., and Owens, Ryan J.. 2016. “Courting the president: how circuit court judges alter their behavior for promotion to the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., and Spriggs, James F. II. 2013. “The citation and depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2): 325–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2015. “The hierarchical influence of courts of appeals on district courts.” The Journal of Legal Studies 44 (1): 113–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., Kim, Pauline T., and Schlanger, Margo. 2020. “Mapping the iceberg: The impact of data sources on the study of district courts.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17 (3): 466–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., and Spriggs, James F.. 2009. “An examination of strategic anticipation of appellate court preferences by federal district court judges.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29: 37.Google Scholar
Broughman, Brian J., and Widiss, Deborah A.. 2017. “After the override: An empirical analysis of shadow precedent.” The Journal of Legal Studies 46 (1): 51–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budziak, Jeffrey. 2017. “The effect of visiting judges on the treatment of legal policy in the US courts of appeals.” Justice System Journal 38 (4): 348–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, Ian, Wudel, James, Kim, Michael, and Jushchuk, James. 2017. “Examining the evolution of legal precedent through citation network analysis.” North Carolina Law Review. 96: 227–69.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Cliff, Friedman, Barry, Martin, Andrew D., and Vanberg, Georg. 2011. “Who controls the content of Supreme Court opinions?” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 400–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., Gulati, Mitu, and Posner, Eric A.. 2012. “What do federal district judges want? An analysis of publications, citations, and reversals.” The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 28 (3): 518–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “A principal-agent theory of en banc review.” The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 25 (1): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2012. “The genealogy of law.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Lauderdale, Benjamin. 2010. “Locating Supreme Court opinions in doctrine space.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 871–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C. 2009. “Uncertain precedent: Circuit court responses to Supreme Court plurality opinions.” American Politics Research 37 (1): 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C. and Wedeking, Justin. 2014. “The (dis) advantage of certainty: The importance of certainty in language.” Law & Society Review 48 (1): 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck-Mayr, JBrandon, Hansford, Thomas G., and Spriggs, James F.. 2021. “Agenda setting and attention to precedent in the US federal courts.” Journal of Law & Courts 9 (2): 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Paul H., Klein, David E., and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2008. “Measuring deviations from expected voting patterns on collegial courts.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5 (4): 819–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Paul H., Klein, David E., and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2012. “Consensus, disorder, and ideology on the Supreme Court.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9 (1): 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feess, Eberhard, and Sarel, Roee. 2018. “Judicial effort and the appeals system: Theory and experiment.” The Journal of Legal Studies 47 (2): 269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Jeon, Sangick. 2008. “The authority of Supreme Court precedent.” Social Networks 30 (1): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., Johnson, Timothy R., Spriggs, James F., Jeon, Sangick, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2007. “Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the US Supreme Court.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Justin, and Vanberg, Georg. 2013. “Narrow versus broad judicial decisions.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 26 (3): 355–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Jerome. 1973. Courts on trial: Myth and reality in American justice. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Walker, Thomas G., and Zorn, Christopher. 2006. “Setting a judicial agenda: The decision to grant en banc review in the US Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 68 (4): 852–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haire, Susan B., Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Songer, Donald R.. 2003. “Appellate court supervision in the federal judiciary: A hierarchical perspective.” Law & Society Review 37 (1): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., and Spriggs, James F.. 2006. The politics of precedent on the US Supreme Court. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkle, Rachael K. 2015. “Legal constraint in the US Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 77 (3): 721–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkle, Rachael K. 2016. “Strategic anticipation of en banc review in the US courts of appeals.” Law & Society Review 50 (2): 383–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, Matthew P. 2016. “Measuring precedent in a judicial hierarchy.” Law & Society Review 50 (1): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, D. Brock. 2007. “The business of the US district courts.” Green Bag 10: 453–67.Google Scholar
Hübert, Ryan. 2019. “Getting their way: Bias and deference to trial courts.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 706–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles A. 1987. “Law, politics, and judicial decision making: Lower federal court uses of Supreme Court decisions.” Law and Society Review 21 (2): 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2011. “Hierarchical and collegial politics on the US courts of appeals.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2017. “The judicial hierarchy: A review essay.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Politics. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke, and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2006. “Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables.” Political Analysis 14 (2): 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M, Lessig, Lawrence, and Solimine, Michael E.. 1998. “Judicial influence: A citation analysis of federal courts of appeals judges.” The Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2): 271–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Yonatan, and Fowler, James H.. 2013. “Strategic citations to precedent on the us supreme court.” The Journal of Legal Studies 42 (1): 151–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the US Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10 (2): 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masood, Ali S., and Kassow, Benjamin J.. 2020. “The sum of its parts: How Supreme Court justices disparately shape attention to their opinions.” Social Science Quarterly 101 (2): 842–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masood, Ali S., Kassow, Benjamin J., and Songer, Donald R.. 2017. “Supreme Court precedent in a judicial hierarchy.” American Politics Research 45 (3): 403–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masood, Ali S., Kassow, Benjamin J., and Songer, Donald R.. 2019. “The aggregate dynamics of lower court responses to the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 7 (2): 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1959. “Lower court checks on Supreme Court power.” American Political Science Review 53 (4): 1017–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Hinkle, Rachael K.. 2018. “Crafting the law: How opinion content influences legal development.” Justice System Journal 39 (2): 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinello, Daniel R. 1999. “Linking party to judicial ideology in American courts: A meta-analysis.” The Justice System Journal 20 (3): 219–54.Google Scholar
Post, David, and Salop, Steven C.. 1991. “Rowing against the tidewater: A theory of voting by multijudge panels.” Georgetown Law Journal 80: 743–77.Google Scholar
Randazzo, Kirk A. 2008. “Strategic anticipation and the hierarchy of justice in US district courts.” American Politics Research 36 (5): 669–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Re, Richard M. 2015. “Narrowing Supreme Court precedent from below.” Georgetown Law Journal 104: 921–72.Google Scholar
Ruger, Theodore W., Kim, Pauline T., Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2004. “The Supreme Court forecasting project: Legal and political science approaches to predicting Supreme Court decisionmaking.” Columbia Law Review 104 (4): 1150–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph L. 2006. “Patterns and consequences of judicial reversals: Theoretical considerations and data from a district court.” Justice System Journal 27 (1): 28–46.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J., Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Segal, Jeffrey A., Ruger, Theodore J., and Benesh, Sara C.. 2018. “2018 Supreme Court Database, Version 2018 Release 2.” Washington University Law, October 17, 2018, previous versions of the database. http://supremecourtdatabase.org
Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F., and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2000. “Measuring legal change: The reliability and validity of Shepard’s Citations.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (2): 327–41.Google Scholar
Stearns, Maxwell L. 2002. Constitutional process: A social choice analysis of Supreme Court decision making. Ann Arbor, Michingan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Westerland, Chad, Segal, Jeffrey A., Epstein, Lee, Cameron, Charles M., and Comparato, Scott. 2010. “Strategic defiance and compliance in the US courts of appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 891–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, Arjun S. 2018. “To lag or not to lag?: Re-evaluating the use of lagged dependent variables in regression analysis.” Political Science Research and Methods 6 (2): 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Sven E., and Butler, Daniel M.. 2007. “A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications.” Political Analysis 15 (2): 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Jeff, Cann, Damon M., and Boyea, Brent D.. 2013. “Judicial ideology and the selection of disputes for US supreme court adjudication.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (4): 847–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salam supplementary material
Salam supplementary material
PDF
189.8 KB