Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:36:40.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases

An Empirical Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Stephen A. Simon
Stephen A. Simon*
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
*
Contact the author at ssimon@richmond.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A trio of Supreme Court decisions between 2002 and 2005 intensified debate over judicial reliance on foreign law. The literature has been dominated by arguments over the desirability of foreign law citations in the abstract, without sufficient attention to how the Court actually has used foreign law. To ground the normative debate, this article presents analysis of a newly created database containing cases from the Court’s earliest period to the present day in which the lead opinions relied on foreign law in deciding constitutional rights cases. The article uses this analysis to (1) make sense of why the recent trio of decisions was so controversial, even though the practice of citing foreign law was not new, and (2) show why many of the justifications offered by scholars for judicial reliance on foreign law bear no relation to how the Court has employed foreign law in practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Fall 2013 , pp. 279 - 301
Copyright
© 2013 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to David Klein and the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this article.

References

Alford, Roger P. 2004. “Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution.” American Journal of International Law 98:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, Roger P. 2005. “In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism.” UCLA Law Review 52:639–714.Google Scholar
Annus, Taavi. 2004. “Comparative Constitutional Reasoning: The Law and Strategy of Selecting the Right Arguments.” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 14:301–49.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan C., and Lee Epstein. 2007. “(Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication.” Law and Social Inquiry 32:791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 2003. Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. 2003/2007. “Keynote Address at the Ninety-Seventh Annual Meeting.” In “A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind …”: Selected Speeches by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on Foreign and International Law, ed. Borgen, Christopher J. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven G., and Stephanie Dotson Zimdahl. 2005. “The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision.” William and Mary Law Review 47:743–909.Google Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit. 1999. “Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation.” Indiana Law Journal 74:819–92.Google Scholar
Cleveland, Sarah H. 2002. “Powers Inherent in Sovereignty: Indians, Aliens, Territories, and the Nineteenth Century Origins of Plenary Power over Foreign Affairs.” Texas Law Review 81:1–284.Google Scholar
Cleveland, Sarah H. 2006. “Our International Constitution.” Yale Journal of International Law 31:1–125.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel. 2007. “The Supreme Court, the Law of Nations, and Citations to Foreign Law.” California Law Review 95:1335–65.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Michael. 2008. “Non-judicial Precedent.” Vanderbilt Law Review 61:713–84.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 2005/2007. “‘A Decent Respect to the Opinions of [Human]kind’: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication.” In “A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind …”: Selected Speeches by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on Foreign and International Law, ed. Borgen, Christopher J. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
Glensy, Rex D. 2005. “Which Countries Count? Lawrence v. Texas and the Selection of Foreign Persuasive Authority.” Virginia Journal of International Law 45:357–449.Google Scholar
Glensy, Rex D. 2010. “Constitutional Interpretation through a Global Lens.” Missouri Law Review 75:1171–1241.Google Scholar
Harding, Sarah K. 2003. “Comparative Reasoning and Judicial Review.” Yale Journal of International Law 28:409–64.Google Scholar
Hills, Roderick, Jr. 2009. “Counting States.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 32:17–28.Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki. 2005. “Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement.” Harvard Law Review 119:109–28.Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki. 2010. Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knop, Karen. 2000. “Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32:501–35.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 2004. “International Law as Part of Our Law.” American Journal of International Law 98:43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lain, Corinna Barrett. 2009. “The Unexceptionalism of ‘Evolving Standards.’” UCLA Law Review 57:365–419.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Mila Versteeg. 2011. “The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism.” California Law Review 99:1163–1249.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O. 2006. “Foreign to Our Constitution.” Northwestern University Law Review 100:303–29.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Sandra Day. 2002/2007. “Keynote Address at the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting.” In “A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind …”: Selected Speeches by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on Foreign and International Law, ed. Borgen, Christopher J. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2005. “Foreword: A Political Court.” Harvard Law Review 119:31–102.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Michael D. 2004. “International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence.” American Journal of International Law 98:69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitaraman, Ganesh. 2009. “The Use and Abuse of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 32:653–93.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Ann Marie. 2004. New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1998. “Returning with Interest: Observations on Some Putative Benefits of Studying Comparative Constitutional Law.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 1:325–49.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2005. “Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium.” Harvard Law Review 119:129–47.Google Scholar
Yeazell, Stephen. 2009. “When and How U.S. Courts Should Cite Foreign Law.” Constitutional Commentary 26:59–74.Google Scholar
Young, Ernest A. 2005. “Foreign Law and the Denominator Problem.” Harvard Law Review 119:148–67.Google Scholar
Zaring, David. 2006. “The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 3:297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar