Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:14:46.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BooK Review Title - Religious Liberty and the American Founding: Natural Rights and the Original Meanings of the First Amendment Religion Clauses. By Vincent Phillip Muñoz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. 334. $95.00 (cloth); $30.00 (paper). ISBN: 9781501753978.

Review products

Religious Liberty and the American Founding: Natural Rights and the Original Meanings of the First Amendment Religion Clauses. By Vincent Phillip Muñoz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. 334. $95.00 (cloth); $30.00 (paper). ISBN: 9781501753978.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2023

Mark L. Movsesian
Mark L. Movsesian*
Affiliation:
Frederick A. Whitney Professor and Co-Director, Center for Law and Religion, St. John’s University, USA mark.movsesian@stjohns.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 141 - 144
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Whittington, Keith, Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

2 Solum, Lawrence B., “Triangulating Public Meaning: Corpus Linguistics, Immersion, and the Constitutional Record,” Brigham Young University Law Review 2017, no. 6 (2017): 1621–82Google Scholar, at 1637.

3 DeGirolami, Marc O., “The Traditions of American Constitutional Law,” Notre Dame Law Review 95, no. 3 (2020): 1123–82Google Scholar.

4 See McGinnis, John O. and Rappaport, Michael B., “Reconciling Originalism and Precedent,” Northwestern University Law Review 103, no. 2 (2009): 803–56Google Scholar.

5 The Nomination of Elena Kagan to Be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States: Hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, 111th Cong. 62 (2010) (statement of Elena Kagan).

6 This phrase is typically attributed to Dutch historian Pieter Geyl. See Larsen, Allison Orr, “Factual Precedents,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 162, no. 1 (2013): 59–116 Google Scholar, at 106n264.

7 For the classic treatment, see Fuller, Lon L., “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers,” Harvard Law Review 62, no. 4 (1949): 616–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 572 U.S. 565 (2014).