See Freud, S., Civilization and Its Discontents, ed. Strachey, J. (New York: W.W. Norton, 1st American ed., 1962): At 48.Google Scholar

de Grazia, S., Of Time, Work, and Leisure (New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1962): At 41.Google Scholar

Olshansky, S. Unterberger, L., “The Meaning of Work and Its Implications for the Ex-Hospital Patient,” Mental Hygiene, 47 (1963): 141 (original emphasis).Google Scholar

See Milazzo-Sayre, L. Henderson, M. Manderscheid, R., “Serious and Severe Mental Illness and Work: What Do We Know?,” in Bonnie, R.J. Monahan, J., eds., Mental Disorder, Work Disability, and the Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997): At 18–19.Google Scholar

Yelin, E. Cistrenas, M., “Employment Patterns among Persons With and Without Mental Conditions,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 47.Google Scholar

See N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 52:27E–21 to −27 (West 1998) (repealed 1994). Certain duties were transferred to Office of the Public Defender. See N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 52:27E-50 to −65 (West 1998).Google Scholar

See, for example, Weidenfeller v. Kidulis, 380 F. Supp. 445, 451 (E.D. Wis. 1971); and Wyatt v. Stickney, 344 F. Supp. 387, 402 (M.D. Ala. 1972), aff'd sub nom. Wyatt v. Aderholt, 503 F.2d 1305 (5th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar

See Souder v. Brennan, 367 F. Supp. 808 (D.D.C. 1973).Google Scholar

See Schindenwolf v. Klein, No. L41293-75 P.W. (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. 1976), reprinted in Perlin, M.L., Mental Disability Law: Civil and Criminal (Charlottesville: Michie, Vol. 2, 1989): § 6.23, at 509–19; compare Davis v. Balson, 461 F. Supp. 842 (N.D. Ohio 1978) (rejecting affirmative right to theory, but finding that countertherapeutic work assignments violated the right to treatment). The theory underlying Schindenwolf is set out in Perlin, M.L., “The Right to Participate in Voluntary, Therapeutic, Compensated Work Programs as Part of the Right to Treatment: A New Theory in the Aftermath of Souder,” Seton Hall Law Review, 7 (1976): 298–339.Google Scholar

See National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976), overruled by Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985); see generally, Perlin (1989), supra note 9, §§ 6.15–16, at 478–88.Google Scholar

See, for example, the few recent cases reported on in Perlin, M.L., Mental Disability Law: Civil and Criminal (Charlottesville: Michie, Cum. Supp., 1997): §§ 6.10-.20, at 283–85.Google Scholar

A law review article has not been published on this topic in at least the last eight years. See id.Google Scholar

Bonnie, R.J., “Work Disability and the Fabric of Mental Health Law: An Introduction,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 1, 2.Google Scholar

Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–213 (1994).Google Scholar

See Milstein, B. Rubenstein, L. Cyr, R., “The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Breathtaking Promise for Persons with Mental Disabilities,” Clearinghouse Review, 25 (1991): At 1240.Google Scholar

Jenkins, K., “Spotlight Finds Hoyer,” Washington Post, May 28, 1990, at D1, as cited in Ackourey, K., “Insuring Americans with Disabilities: How Far Can Congress Go to Protect Traditional Practices?,” Emory Law Journal, 40 (1991): At 1183 n.1.Google Scholar

“Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Summary and Analysis,” Special Supplement (BNA), at S-5 (1990), as cited in Ackourey, , supra note 16, at 1183 n.2 (statement by bill's sponsors). See also, for example, Law, S., “The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Burden on Business or Dignity for the Disabled?,” Duquense Law Review, 30 (1991): 99–114 (describing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as a “solid and positive step toward making this country a better nation”).Google Scholar

Perlin, , supra note 11, § 6.44A, at 297 (ADA stands as Congress's “most innovative attempt to address the pervasive problem of discrimination against mentally and physically handicapped citizens”); see generally Perlin, M.L., “‘Make Promises by the Hour’: Sex, Drugs, the ADA, and Psychiatric Hospitalization,” DePaul Law Review, 46 (1997): 947–85.Google Scholar

See Perlin, M.L., “‘Where the Winds Hit Heavy on the Borderline’: Mental Disability Law, Theory and Practice, ‘Us’ and ‘Them’,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 31, no. 3 (1998): (in press); see also Perlin, M.L., “The ADA and Persons with Mental Disabilities: Can Sanist Attitudes Be Undone?,” Journal of Law & Health, 8 (1993–94): 24–45.Google Scholar

Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(1) (1987); see generally Pryor, E.S., “Mental Disabilities and the Disability Fabric,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 153.Google Scholar

Ravitch, F., “Balancing Fundamental Disability Policies: The Relationship Between the Americans with Disabilities Act and Social Security Disability,” Georgetown Journal on Fighting Poverty, 1 (1994): 240–51.Google Scholar

Bonnie, , supra note 13, at 4.Google Scholar

The classic treatment is Allport, G., The Nature of Prejudice (Garden City: Doubleday, 1958). For an important new, and different, perspective, see Young-Bruehl, E., The Anatomy of Prejudices (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996). See also Perlin, M.L., “On ‘Sanism’,” Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46 (1992): 373–407.Google Scholar

See Bonnie, , supra note 13, at 7.Google Scholar

See Milazzo-Sayre, Henderson Manderscheid, , supra note 4, at 18–19.Google Scholar

See id. at 18 tbl.1.Google Scholar

See id. at 21.Google Scholar

See Yelin, Cistrenas, , supra note 5, at 44.Google Scholar

Estroff, S., “‘No Other Way to Go’: Pathways to Disability Income Application among Persons with Severe, Persistent Mental Illness,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 94.Google Scholar

Id. at 95.Google Scholar

Id. at 96.Google Scholar

Strauss, J. Davidson, L., “Mental Disorders, Work, and Choice,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 127.Google Scholar

See Warner, R. Polak, P., “Economic Opportunities and Disincentives for People with Mental Illness,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 147.Google Scholar

See Hall, L.L., “Making the ADA Work for People with Psychiatric Disabilities,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 273–76.Google Scholar

Bonnie, R.J. Monahan, J., “Epilogue,” in Bonnie, Monahan, , eds., supra note 4, at 299–301.Google Scholar