45 C.F.R. Part 46, Subpart A (2017). Note that 45 C.F.R. Part 46 refers to the regulations for the Department of Health and Human Services, while each of the other 15 agencies has its own part (e.g., 7 C.F.R. part 1c for the Department of Agriculture).Google Scholar

Nichols, L., Brako, L., Rivera, S.M., Tahmassian, A., Jones, M.F., Pierce, H.H., and Bierer, B.E., “What Do Revised U.S. Rules mean for Human Research?” Science 357, no. 6352 (2017) 650–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, 82 Federal Register 7149-7274 (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. pt. 46) (original effective date January 19, 2018); Delay of the Revisions to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, 83 Federal Register 2885-2894 (establishing an effective date of July 19, 2018; indicating plans to propose an additional 6-month delay).Google Scholar

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Belmont Report), DHEW Publication OS78-0012, Washington, D.C., September 30, 1978.Google Scholar

Kopelman, L.M.. “Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2006): 351–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Office of Human Research Protection, Department of Health & Human Services, “FWAs,” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/register-irbs-and-obtain-fwas/fwas/index.html> (last visited February 2, 2018); Department of Health and Human Services, “Assurance Process FAQs: What research does the Federalwide Assurance (FWA) cover” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/assurance-process/index.html> (last visited February 2, 2018); Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, supra note 3, at 7180-7181.+(last+visited+February+2,+2018);+Department+of+Health+and+Human+Services,+“Assurance+Process+FAQs:+What+research+does+the+Federalwide+Assurance+(FWA)+cover”+available+at++(last+visited+February+2,+2018);+Federal+Policy+for+the+Protection+of+Human+Subjects,+supra+note+3,+at+7180-7181.>Google Scholar

Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, Federal Register 80, 53933-54061, at 54044.Google Scholar

Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, “AAHRPP Accreditation Standards” available at <http://www.aahrpp.org/apply/resources/procedures-and-standards> (last visited February 2, 2018>.+(last+visited+February+2,+2018>.>Google Scholar

Research Ethics and Compliance, University of Michigan. “HRPP Innovation & Demonstration Initiative” available at <http://research-compliance.umich.edu/hrpp-innovation-demonstration-initiative> (last visited February 2, 2018); Flexibility Coalition, Office for the Protection of Research Subjects, University of Southern California, “Flexibility,” available at <http://oprs.usc.edu/about/initiatives/flex/> (last visited February 2, 2018); Flexibility Coalition, Office for the Protection of Research Subjects, University of Southern California, “Creative Flexibility,” available at <https://oprs.usc.edu/files/2013/07/Creative-Flexibility-Packet-2.29.16.pdf> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018);+Flexibility+Coalition,+Office+for+the+Protection+of+Research+Subjects,+University+of+Southern+California,+“Flexibility,”+available+at++(last+visited+February+2,+2018);+Flexibility+Coalition,+Office+for+the+Protection+of+Research+Subjects,+University+of+Southern+California,+“Creative+Flexibility,”+available+at++(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, Federal Register 76, 44512-44531, at 44514.Google Scholar

See supra note 7, at 53936.Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, supra note 3, at 7181.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.102(d)Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 7, at 7260.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.101(b).Google Scholar

Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services. “Exempt Research and Research That May Undergo Expedited Review,” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/exempt-research-and-research-expedited-review/index.html> (last visited on February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+on+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

See supra note 8.Google Scholar

Loe, J.D., Winkelman, D.A., and Robertson, C.T.. “An Assessment of the Human Subjects Protection Review Process for Exempt Research,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 44, no. 3 (2016): 481–491.Google Scholar

Shweder, R.A. and Nisbett, R.E., “Long-Sought Research Deregulation Is Upon Us. Don't Squander the Moment,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 63, no. 28 (2017): A44–A44; K. Murphy, “Less Scrutiny for Social Scientists,” New York Times, May 22, 2017, D3.Google Scholar

See supra note 20.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.101(b)(2)Google Scholar

Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, American Association of University Professors, “Regulation of Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board,” available at <https://www.aaup.org/report/regulation-research-human-subjects-academic-freedom-and-institutional-review-board> (last visited on February 2, 2018); Committee on Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, “Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences,” (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014).+(last+visited+on+February+2,+2018);+Committee+on+Revisions+to+the+Common+Rule+for+the+Protection+of+Human+Subjects+in+Research+in+the+Behavioral+and+Social+Sciences,+Board+on+Behavioral,+Cognitive,+and+Sensory+Sciences,+Committee+on+National+Statistics,+Committee+on+Population,+Division+of+Behavioral+and+Social+Sciences+and+Education,+Institute+of+Medicine,+National+Research+Council,+“Proposed+Revisions+to+the+Common+Rule+for+the+protection+of+Human+Subjects+in+the+Behavioral+and+Social+Sciences,”+(Washington,+DC:+The+National+Academies+Press,+2014).>Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 3 at 7262; 111(a)(7) describes the criteria for IRB approval of data security: “When appropriate, there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data.” At 7264.Google Scholar

See id.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.101(b)(4).Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7262.Google Scholar

Hausman, D.M., “Group Risks, Risks to Groups, and Group Engagement in Genetics Research,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2007): 351–369; D.B. Resnik, R.R. Sharp. “Protecting Third Parties in Human Subjects Research,” IRB 28, no. 4 (2006): 1-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, “Research Exempt from IRB Review” available at <https://irb.research.chop.edu/sites/default/files/documents/IRBSOP302.pdf> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7262-7263.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.109(e).Google Scholar

Office of Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, “Continuing Review Guidance (2010),” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/guidance-on-continuing-review-2010/> (last visited on August 24, 2017).+(last+visited+on+August+24,+2017).>Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.109(e).Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 3 at 7264; §110 is “Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research;” limited IRB review under §104(d)(2)(iii) and (d)(3)(i)(C) covers review of data security and under §104 (d)(7) and (8) covers review of broad consent.Google Scholar

See supra note 3 at 7206.Google Scholar

Office of Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, “Clinical Research and the HIPAA Privacy Rule,” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/research/index.html?language=es> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7267.Google Scholar

Millum, J. and Menikoff, J.. “Streamlining Ethical Review,” Annals of Internal Medicine 153, no. 10 (2010): 655–657; C. Grady, “Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges,” Chest 148, no. 5 (2015): 1148-1155; A-M. Ervin, H.A. Taylor, and S. Ehrhardt, “NIH Policy on Single-IRB Review – A New Era in Multicenter Studies,” N. Engl. J. Med. 375, no. 24 (2016): 2315-2317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Institutes of Health, “Final NIH Policy on the Use of a Single Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research,” available at <https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-16-094.html> (last visited February 2, 2018). The deadline has been extended twice already, and may have been extended again by the time this article is published.+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).+The+deadline+has+been+extended+twice+already,+and+may+have+been+extended+again+by+the+time+this+article+is+published.>Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. Part 46.110; Office of Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, “OHRP Expedited Review Categories (1998),” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/categories-of-research-expedited-review-procedure-1998/index.html> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7264.Google Scholar

Office of Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, “July 25-26, 2017 - SACHRP Meeting” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/meetings/2017-july-25-26.index.html> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

Subpart B: 45 C.F.R. 46.201-207; Subpart C: 45 C.F.R. 46.301-306; Subpart D: 45 C.F.R. 46.401-409.Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7151.Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7261.Google Scholar

See id.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. 46.204(b).Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. 46.204(i).Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 3, at 7183.Google Scholar

Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, “Tip Sheet 27: Developing and Applying Equivalent Protections,” available at <https://admin.share.aahrpp.org/Website%20Documents/Tip_Sheet_27_Guidance_on_Equivalent_Protections.pdf> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

See supra note 33.Google Scholar

45 C.F.R. 46.406.Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

Office of Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, “What Happens if a Human Subject Becomes a Prisoner during the Course of a Research Study?” available at <https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/prisoner-research/index.html> (last visited February 2, 2018).+(last+visited+February+2,+2018).>Google Scholar

See supra note 9.Google Scholar

See supra note 5.Google Scholar