Compare
United States v. Nechy, 827 F.2d 1161, 1166 (7th Cir. 1987) (upholding search of pharmacy not conducted pursuant to criminal warrant);
United States v. Jamieson – McKames Pharm., 651 F.2d 532, 541–42 (8th Cir. 1981) (upholding warrantless search of pharmaceutical business); United States ex rel.
Terraciano v. Montanye, 493 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1974) (upholding warrantless search of pharmacy for prescription drug records);
Murphy v. State, 115 Wn. App. 297, 62 P.3d 533 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003) (upholding warrantless search of customer's drug records);
State v. Russo, 259 Conn. 436, 790 A.2d 1132 (Conn. 2002) (same);
State v. Welch, 160 Vt. 70, 624 A.2d 1105 (Vt. 1992) (same), with
Murphy v. Townsend, 187 F.3d 648, 1999 WL 439468 (9th Cir. 1999) (unpublished opinion) (affirming denial of qualified immunity on summary judgment because factual dispute existed as to whether defendants conducted warrantless search of customer's pharmacy records), and
United States v. Enserro, 401 F. Supp. 460 (W.D.N.Y. 1975) (finding warrantless search of pharmacy illegal).
Google Scholar