Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T20:23:46.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioethics and the National Security State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jonathan D. Moreno
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

it is mandatory that in building up our strength, we enlarge upon our technical superiority by an accelerated exploitation of the scientific potential of the United States and our allies. National Security Council, NSC-G8: United States Objectives and Program for National Security April 14, 1950

Innovation within the armed forces will rest on experimentation with new approaches to warfare, strengthening joint operations, exploiting U.S. intelligence advantages, and takingfull advantage of science and technology. George W Bush, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 17,2002

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Summer 2004 , pp. 198 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Naval War College Review, Vol. XXVII (1975): 51–108.Google Scholar
At <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss9.html> (last visited March 14, 2004).+(last+visited+March+14,+2004).>Google Scholar
Moreno, J. D., Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans (New York: W.H. Freeman, 1999); Moreno, J.D., “‘The Only Feasible Means’: The Pentagon’s Ambivalent Relationship with the Nuremberg Code,” in Bioethics, Justice, and Health Care, Teays, W. Purdy, L.M., eds., (California: Wadsworth, 2000); Moreno, J.D., “Reassessing the Influence of the Nuremberg Code in American Medical Ethics,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 12 (1997):347–360; Faden, R. et al. , “United States Researchers, The Nazi Doctors’ Trial, and the Nuremberg Code: A Review of the Findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments,”JAMA 276, no. 20 (1996):1667–1671; Moreno, J.D. Lederer, S.E., “Revising the History of Cold War Research Ethics,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6, no. 3 (1996): 223–238.Google Scholar
Moreno, J.D., ed., In the Wake of Terror: Medicine and Morality in a Time of Crisis (Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press, 2003); Moreno, J.D., “Remember Saddam’s Human Guinea Pigs,” The American Journal of Bioethics 3, no.2 (2003): W53; Moreno, J.D., “Human Experiments and National Security: The Need to Clarify Policy,”Cambridge Quarterly of Research Ethics 12, no. 2(2003): 192–195; Moreno, J.D., “A New World Order for Human Experiments,” Accountability in Research 10 (2003):47–56.Google Scholar
Weldes, J. et al. , eds., Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger(Minneapolis: Borderlines, 1999).Google Scholar
Yergin, D., Shattered Peace: The Origins of the Cold War (New York: Penguin, 1977): 196.Google Scholar
The ensuing account is especially indebted to M. J. Hogan, A Cross of Iron: Harry Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Moreno, , supra note 3, at 35–36.Google Scholar
Hogan, , supra note 7, at 235.Google Scholar
Id. at 241.Google Scholar
Moreno, , supra note 3, at 136.Google Scholar
Id. at 137–138.Google Scholar
Id. at 149.Google Scholar
Id. at 162.Google Scholar
See <http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/lovett.htm> (last visited March 9, 2004).+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
See <http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/wilson.htm> (last visited March 9, 2004).+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, The Human Radiation Experiments (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996): 56.Google Scholar
Army Regulation 70–25: Use of Volunteers as Subjects of Research, 28 March 1962.1 am grateful to Art Anderson for calling my attention to this regulation.Google Scholar
United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987).Google Scholar
See <http://deploymentliruc.osd.mil/current_issues/shad/shad_tests.shtml>, (last visited March 14, 2003).,+(last+visited+March+14,+2003).>Google Scholar
See <http://deploymentlink.osd.mil/news/jan02/news_10402_001.shtml>, (last visited March 9, 2004).,+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
Shanker, T., “Reports Detail Tests of Troops For Exposures,” New York Times, July 1, 2003: 21A.Google Scholar
See <http://www.iom.edu/project.asp?ID=4909> (last visited March 9, 2004).+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
See <http://deploymentlink.osd.mil/current_issues/shad/shad_tests.shtml> (last visited March 14, 2004).+(last+visited+March+14,+2004).>Google Scholar
Although this impression is hard to quantify, it is a conclusion reached based on my work for the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments and many conversations with agency officials.Google Scholar
Moreno, J.D., “Bioethics After the Terror,” American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2002): 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Pentagon Plans to Proceed with Development of Anthrax Strain,” New York Times, September 4, 2001.Google Scholar
Press release, St. Louis University,“Volunteers are Still Needed for Smallpox Study,” November 13, 2001.Google Scholar
“Volunteers Line Up to Test Smallpox Protection,” New York Times, November 3, 2001.Google Scholar
“Small Number of Children to be Inoculated, Officials Say,” Newsday, September 25, 2002.Google Scholar
Frey, S.E. et al. “Dose-Related Effects of Smallpox Vaccine,” New Eng. J. of Med. 346, no. 17 (2002): 1275–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See <http://mrmc-www.army.mil/docs/rcq/ar70–25.pdf> (last visited March 9, 2004).+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
See <http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0214/p02s01-usmi.html> (last visited March 9, 2004).+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
See <http://www.jnlwd.usmc.mil/mission.asp> (last visited March 9, 2004).+(last+visited+March+9,+2004).>Google Scholar
Naval Studies Board, National Research Council, An Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons Science and Technology (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Moreno, J.D., “Neuroethics: An Agenda for Neuroscience and Society,” Nature Neuroscience 4, no. 2 (2003): 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J.D., “The BioShield Bonanza and Human Experimentation,” Research USA 1, no. 2 (2003): 29.Google Scholar
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss1.html> (last visited March 14, 2004).+(last+visited+March+14,+2004).>Google Scholar
“Focus on Smallpox Threat Revived,” Washington Post, July 17, 2003: A3.Google Scholar
Dallek, R., An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917–1963 (New York: Little, Brown, 2003): 464–466.Google Scholar
Kevles, D., “A Security Clampdown on Biotechnology Research,” Technology Review 106, no. 6 (2003): 40–48.Google Scholar
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, supra note 17: 79.Google Scholar