Hotez, P. J., “Neglected Infections of Poverty in the United States of America,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6 (2008), available at <http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi%2Fl0.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0000256> (last visited October 1, 2008).Google Scholar

Beecher, H. K., “Ethics and Clinical Research,” New England Journal of Medicine 274, no. 24 (1966): 1354–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, J. H., Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Rothman, D. J. Rothman, S. M., The Willowbrook Wars (Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction, 2005).Google Scholar

Heller, J., “Syphilis Victims in the U.S. Study Went Untreated for 40 Years,” New York Times, July 26, 1972, at 1, 8.Google Scholar

National Research Act of 1974, PL 93–348.Google Scholar

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979); The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Research on the Fetus (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974); The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Research Involving Prisoners (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976); The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Research Involving Children (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977); The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Research Involving Those Institutionalized as Mentally Infirm (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978).Google Scholar

45 CFR 46.111(b).Google Scholar

Levine, C. Faden, R. Grady, C. Hammerschmidt, D. Eckenwiler, L. Sugarman, J., “The Limitations of ‘Vulnerability’ as a Protection for Human Research Participants,” American Journal of Bioethics 4, no. 3 (2004): 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Belmont Report, supra note 7, at C.3.Google Scholar

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), “International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects,” Geneva, 2002, at Guideline 13, available at <http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm> (last visited August 12, 2008).+(last+visited+August+12,+2008).>Google Scholar

Id., at Guideline 13, commentary.Google Scholar

National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, Vol. I (Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission: 2001): At iv.Google Scholar

Kipnis, K., “Vulnerability in Research Subjects: A Bioethical Taxonomy,” in National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, Vol. II (Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2001): At G-1-G-13.Google Scholar

See NBAC, supra note 13, at 85.Google Scholar

See supra note 8.Google Scholar

Iltis, A. S. Wall, A. Lesandrini, J. Rangel, E. Chibnall, J., “Federal Interpretation and Enforcement of Protections for Vulnerable Participants in Human Research,” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 4, no. 3 (2009): In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Levine, , supra note 9, at 46.Google Scholar

Id., at 47.Google Scholar

Id., at 46.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T. L. Jennings, B. Kinney, E. D. Levine, R. J., “Pharmaceutical Research Involving the Homeless,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27, no. 5 (2001): 547–564; Berry, S. R., “For Purposes of Research, Palliative Care Patients Should Not Be Considered a Vulnerable Population,” Clinical Oncology 16 (2004): 223–224; Hawryluck, L., “People at the End of Life Are a Vulnerable Research Population,” Clinical Oncology 16 (2004): 225–226; Cohen, P. J., “Untreated Addiction Imposes an Ethical Bar to Recruiting Addicts for Non-Therapeutic Studies of Addictive Drugs,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30, no. 1 (2002): 73–81; List, J., “Histories of Mistrust and Protectionism: Disadvantaged Minority Groups and Human-Subject Research Policies,” American Journal of Bioethics 5, no. 1 (2004): 53–55; Lott, J. P., “Vulnerable/Special Participant Populations,” Developing World Bioethics 5, no. 1 (2005): 30–54; Seidenfeld, J. Horstmann, E. Emanuel, E. Grady, C., “Participants in Phase 1 Oncology Research Trials: Are They Vulnerable?” Archives of Internal Medicine 168, no. 1 (2008): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries (Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2001); National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity (Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 1998).Google Scholar

Coleman, C. H., “Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, C., “Vulnerability in Research: Individuals with Limited Financial and/or Social Resources,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bustillos, D., “Limited English Proficiency and Disparities in Clinical Research,” Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dresser, R., “First-in-Human Trial Participants: Not a Vulnerable Population, but Vulnerable Nonetheless,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menikoff, J., “The Vulnerability of the Very Sick,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tait, R. C., “Vulnerability in Clinical Research with Patients in Pain: A Risk Analysis,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, P. J., “Vulnerable Brains: Research Ethics and Neurosurgical Patients,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 1 (2009): 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar