Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:25:24.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: theoretical and typological implications1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Guglielmo Cinque
Guglielmo Cinque
Affiliation:
Seminario di Linguistica, Università di Venezia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , September 1996 , pp. 447 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, E. (1971). Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 153–166.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1972). Theory of complementation in English syntax. Ph. D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Brugè, L. (1995). II movimento del dimostrativo in spagnolo. Ms., Università di Venezia e Padova.Google Scholar
Charette, M. (1991). Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). On the notion ‘rule of grammar’. In Fodor, J. & Katz, J. (eds.) The structure of language: readings in the philosophy of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 119–136.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1994). On the evidence for partial N-movement in the romance DP. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L. & Zanuttini, R. (eds.) Paths towards universal grammar. Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 85–110.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (forthcoming). Adverbs and the universal hierarchy of functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colarusso, J. (1979). Rightward movement, question formation and the nature of transformational processes: the Circassian case. Papiere zur Linguistik 21. 27–73.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1988). Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: dispelling a myth. Lingua 74. 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1989). Article-noun order, Papers from the 25th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 83–97.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, R. (1977). On trace theory. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 35–61.Google Scholar
Giusti, G. (1992). Heads and modifiers among determiners: evidence from Romanian and German. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 3. CLI. (Published in Cinque, G. & Giusti, G. (eds.) (1995). Advances in Roumanian linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 103–125.)Google Scholar
Giusti, G. (1993). La sintassi dei determinanti. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. (ed.) Universals of language. (2nd edn.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 73–113.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1983). Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1988). On explaining some left-right asymmetries in syntactic and morphological universals. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E., Wirth, J. (eds.) Studies in syntactic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, E. S. (1974). Navajo spatial enclitics: A case for unbounded rightward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 507–533.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. (1990). ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology 7. 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1990). Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7. 192–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1989). Notes on English agreement. CIEFL Bulletin 1. 41–67.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1991). Romance elitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 647–686.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, K. (1990). Explaining word order in the noun phrase. Linguistics 28. 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1995). The fine structure of the left periphery. MS., Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Satyanarayana, P. & Subbarao, K. V. (1973). Are rightward movement rules upward bounded? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 3.1. 182–192.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. (1981). The internal structure of NP in verb final languages. Papers from the 17th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 411–418.Google Scholar