Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:12:35.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax. (Topics in English Linguistics, 2.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. Pp. viii + 510.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

David Denison
Affiliation:
University of Manchester.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, John (1990). On the status of auxiliaries in notional grammar. JL 26. 341362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breivik, Leiv Egil (1983). Existential ‘there’: a synchronic and diachronic study (Studia Anglistica Norvegica 2). Department of English, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Muysken, Pieter (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners – a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2. 93119.Google Scholar
Rydén, Mats & Brorström, Sverker (1987). The ‘be/have’ variation with intransitives in English: with special reference to the Late Modern period (Stockholm Studies in English, 70). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter (1990). The semantics of syntactic change: aspects of the evolution of ‘do’ in English (Trends in Linguistics/Studies and Monographs, 47). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Young-Scholten, Martha (1991). Verb raising in second language acquisition: the early stages. In Universal grammar in second language acquisition (Theorie des Lexikons, 4; Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs, 282). The LEXLERN Project, Seminar für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Düsseldorf. 147.Google Scholar