Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-z8dg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T09:16:51.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

H. E. Brekle, Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1970 (Internationale Bibliothek für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Band 4). - S. Žepić, Morphologie und Semantik der deutschen Nominalkomposita. Zagreb: Philosophische Fakultät der Universität, 1970 (Zagrebačke Germanističke Studije, Svezak 3).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

D. J. Allerton
D. J. Allerton
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, University of Manchester.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1972 , pp. 321 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allerton, D. J. with French, M. A. (in press). Morphology: the forms of English. In Bolton, W. F. (ed.), History of English literature, vol. XII, the English language. London: Sphere Books. 79–134.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. E. (eds.) (1970). Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dam, J. van (1950). Handbuch der deutschen Sprache, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1–88.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Lg 23. 321–343.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1946). A modern English grammar, vol. VI. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1960). The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1970). Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds. In Bierwisch & Heidolph (1970). 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation, 2nd ed.Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Morciniec, N. (1964). Die nominalen Wortzusammensetzungen in den westgermanischen Sprachen. Wrocław/Breslau: Travaux de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Wroclaw, seria A nr. 99.Google Scholar
Motsch, W. (1970). Analyse von Komposita mit Zwei nominalen Elementen. In Bierwisch & Heidolph (1970). 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, C. (1966). Review of Lees (1960). IF 71. 161–169.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tobler, L. (1886). Über die Zusammensetzung nebst einem Anhang über die verstärkenden Zusammensetzung (ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft), Berlin.Google Scholar