Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:19:59.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Harris on performatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Willis J. Edmondson
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität, Bochum

Extract

Harris (1978) argues against the ‘descriptive’ interpretation of performative utterances on the ground that on a particular occasion of its use I apologize may not constitute a ‘genuine instance of apologizing’, although the use of that utterance on that occasion may be ‘correctly described’ by using the verb APOLOGIZE non-performatively, as in (these are Harris's examples): (1) S apologized to the lamp-post, and even the police sergeant laughed. (2) S apologized on T's behalf, although T himself flatly refused to.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1963). Performative-constative. In Caton, C. E. (ed.), Philosophy and ordinary language. London: University of Illinois Press. 2254.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses. LiS 5. 257313.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1978). The descriptive interpretation of performative utterances. JL 14. 309310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempson, R. M. (1975). Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 15.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1976) Metalanguage, pragmatics and performatives. In Rameh, C. (ed.), Semantics: theory and application. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 8198.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1977). Language and tact. (Linguistic Agency, University of Trier, Series A, 46.)Google Scholar
Meyer-Hermann, R. (1976). Direkter und Indirekter Sprechakt. Deutsche Sprache I. 119.Google Scholar