Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T12:58:34.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interpretation of adjectival comparatives1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ewan Klein
Ewan Klein
Affiliation:
Department of English Language, University of Newcastleupon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I shall present a truth conditional semantics for simple adjectival comparatives. The leading idea is that the semantics should hug closely to the surface syntax of the construction and should not depend on postulating degrees or extents as primitive entities. The remainder of this introductory section will raise some objections to existing accounts of the semantics of comparative constructions. In Section 2 it will be argued that an adequate analysis of compared adjectives must take into account the vagueness of positive adjectives, and that the latter can be captured by interpreting degree adjectives as partial functions. Section 3 contains an analysis of degree modifiers, and in Section 4 this analysis provides the basis for the interpretation of comparatives. Section 5 spells out some consequences of the theory, while the last section contains a summary and conclusion.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 113 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowers, J. S. (1975). Adjectives and adverbs in English. FL 13. 529–562.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. W. (1973). Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. LIn 4. 275–343.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. W. (1975). Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. LAn I. 25–74.Google Scholar
Cantrall, W. R. (1977). Comparison and beyond. PCLS 13. 69–81.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T. & Akmajian, A. (eds.) Format syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71–132.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. (1976). The semantics of degree. In Partee, B. (ed.), Montague grammar. New York: Academic Press. 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1976). Montague grammar and the lexical decomposition of causative verbs. In Partee, B. (ed.), Montague grammar. New York: Academic Press. 201–245.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. E. (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1975). Polarity and the scale principle. PCLS 11. 188–199.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: impticature, presupposition and logical form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, P.-K. & Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Montague's ‘Universal Grammar’: An introduction for the linguist. LaPh 3, 185–223.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. (1980). A compositional semantics for comparatives. Unpublished, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1973). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, J. A. W. (1975). Two theories of adjectives. In Keenan, E. L. (ed), Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge: C.U.P. 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1977). Syntax and semantics of questions. LaPh I. 3–44.Google Scholar
Klein, E. H. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. LaPh 4. 1–45.Google Scholar
Klein, E. H. (forthcoming). Determiners and the category Q. To appear in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1970). Another nonsource for comparatives. Lln I. 128–129.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. T. & Bever, T. G. (1973). Can a not unhappy person be called a not sad one? In Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 392–409.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1961). Grammatical analysis of the English comparative construction. Word 17. 171–185.Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, A. (1978). Comparatives and factives. Lln 9. 308–310.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1973). External NPs versus annotated deep structures. Lln 4. 221–240.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1981). Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic but were ashamed to ask. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. (1973). Comparative constructions in English: A syntactic and semantic analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1970). English as a formal language. In Thomason, R. H. (ed), Formal philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. 188–221.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1972). Some problems concerning the logic of grammatical modifiers. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G. (eds.), Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel. 127–141.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1969). A proposed rule of tree-pruning. In Reibel, D. A. & Schane, S. A. (eds.), Modern studies in English: readings in transformational grammar. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 288–299.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. & Perlmutter, D.M. (1970). A nonsource for comparatives. Lln 1. 127–128.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1977) Truth and approximations. PBLS 3. 430–439.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. (1973). The comparative. In Kiefer, F. & Ruwet, N. (eds.), Generative grammar in Europe. Dordrecht: Reidel. 528–564.Google Scholar
Siegel, M. E. A. (1979) Measure adjectives in Montague Grammar. In Davis, S. & Mithun, M. (eds.), Linguistics, philosophy, and Montague Grammar. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Vlach, F. (1974). Factives and negatives. Berkeley Studies in syntax and semantics 1.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. (1972). Attributives and their modifiers. Noûs 6. 319–334.Google Scholar