Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T12:26:29.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Janet Dean Fodor: Semantics: theories of meaning in generative grammar. New York: Crowell, 1977. Pp. xi + 225.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Deirdre Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University College London.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese 17. 304323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds) Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Ph.D. thesis, M.I.T.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. In Thomason, R. (ed.) New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (to appear). Ordered entailments: an alternative to presuppositional theories. In Oh, C. K. (ed.), Syntax and semantics: presuppositions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar