Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T20:29:43.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Melissa Bowerman, Early syntactic development. A cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 11.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. Pp. xii + 302.

Review products

Melissa Bowerman, Early syntactic development. A cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 11.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. Pp. xii + 302.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Martin Atkinson
Martin Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 87 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bar-Hillel, Y. (1970). Communication and argumentation in pragmatic languages. In Visentini, B. et al. Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica. Milan: Edizioni di Comunità. 269–284.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley. 279–362.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M. (1968). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Blount, B. G. (1969). Acquisition of language by Luo children. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Lg 39. 1–14.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1970). The first sentences of child and chimpanzee. In Brown, R., Psycholinguistics: selected papers. New York: The Free Press. 208–231.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, , Courtney, B. & Bellugi-Klima, U. (1968). The child's grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. P. (ed.), Minnesota symposium on child development, Vol. 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 28–73.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. & Wales, R. (1970). The study of language acquisition. In Lyons, J. (ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. 242–260.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1973) Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1–88.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Some problems for case grammar. Working papers in linguistics, No. 10. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University. 245–265.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1966). How to learn to talk: some simple ways. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds.), The genesis of language: a psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 105–122.Google Scholar
Grégoire, A. (1937). L'apprentisage du langage; les deux premières années. Bibliothèque de la Fac. de Philos, et Lettres de l'Univ. de Liège.Google Scholar
Heringer, J. & Wolontis, M. (1972). Focus in Finnish. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 152–161.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernan, K. T. (1969). The acquisition of language by Samoan children. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. T. (1939–1949). Speech development of a bilingual child. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. M. (1936). Infant speech: a study of the beginnings of language. London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1966). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds.), The genesis of language: a psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 15–84.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The development of language. In Mussen, P. A. (ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd edition). New York: Wiley. 1061–1161.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S. (1964). The development of grammar in child language. In Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (eds.), The acquisition of language. (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29.) 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. Z. (1970). The acquisition of German syntax. Working paper, Psychological Institute, University of Münster.Google Scholar
Sauvageot, A. (1949). Esquisse de la langue finnoise. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1967). A note on the relationship between psychological and linguistic theories. FL 3. 397–402.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds.), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 175–208.Google Scholar
Staal, J. F. (1967). Word order in Sanskrit and universal grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar