Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T20:32:22.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peter H. Matthews, Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. xiii + 272.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

James D. McCawley
James D. McCawley
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , September 1995 , pp. 444 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, B. & Traeger, J. L. (1942). Qutline of linguistic analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1914). An introduction to the study of language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1970). A Leonard Bloomfield anthology. (Edited by Charles F. Hockett) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1956). Thre models for the description of language. In IRE transactions on information theory. (Vol. IT-2) 113–124. (Corrected version in Luce, R. D., Bush, R. & Galanter, E. (eds.) (1965). Readings in mathmatical psychology. (Vol.2.) New York: Wiley.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1957). syntactic structures. The Hauge: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1962). A transformational approach to syntax. In Hill, A. A. (ed.) Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in Enlish. University of Texas Press. 128–58.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1981). Lectures on government and bindind. New Yord: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1946). From morpheme to utterance. Language 22. 16183.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional structure. Word 10. 146–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocdett, C. F. (1952). Review of Recherches structurales 1949. International Journal of American Linguistics 18. 66–99.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
McCawley, J. D. (1975). Review of N. A. Chomsky, Studies on semantics in generative grammar. Studies in English Linguistics 3. 209–311.Google Scholar
Nida, E. (1946). Morphology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K. (1976). On the historical source of immediate constituent analysis. In McCawley, J. D. (ed.) Notes from the Linguistic Underground: Syntax and semantics 7. New York: Academic Press. 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1964). Constituent strucure. Supplement to International Journal of American Linguistics. 30.Google Scholar
Read, A. & Kellogg, B. (1885). Higher lessons in English. New York: Clark and Maynard.Google Scholar
Sellar, W. C. & Yeatman, R. J. (1930). 1066 and all that. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1968). The architecture of complexity. In Simon, H. A.The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 84–118.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1891). A new English grammer. (Part t.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. & Voegelin, F. M. (1976). Some recent (and not so recent) attenmpts to interpret semantics of native language in North America. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.) American Indian languages and American linguistics. Lisse: Peter de Ridder. 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar