Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T20:18:21.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tanya Reinhart, Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm, 1983. Pp. vi + 223.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rose Maclaran
Affiliation:
Centre for Language and Communication Studies, University of Dublin.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. & Partee, B. H. (1980). Anaphora and semantic structure. In Kreiman & Oteda (eds.), 128.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). On binding. LIn 11.1. 146.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1979). The interpretation of pronouns. In Heny, F. & Schnelle, H. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 10. New York: Academic Press. 6172.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1980). Comments on the paper by Bach and Partee. In Kreiman & Oteda (eds.), 2940.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. (1983). Definite NPs and context-dependence: a unified theory of anaphora. Unpublished manuscript, S.O.A.S.Google Scholar
Kreiman, K. J. & Oteda, A. E. (eds.) (1980). Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics SocietyGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (1981). Definite NP anaphora and c-command domains. LIn 12.4. 605635.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 6.1. 4788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar