Article contents
Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xxii + 586.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2014
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022226714000127/resource/name/firstPage-S0022226714000127a.jpg)
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
REFERENCES
Chang, Nancy, De Beule, Joachim & Micelli, Vanessa. 2012. Computational Construction Grammar: Comparing ECG and FCG. In Steels, Luc (ed.), Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar: A new formalism for the representation of lexicons and grammars (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7249), 259–288. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical and less so. In Ruiz de, Francisco J.Ibáñez, Mendoza & Cervel, M. Sandra Peña (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Cognitive (Construction) Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 167–176.Google Scholar
van Trijp, Remi. 2013. A comparison between Fluid Construction Grammar and Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 5, 88–116.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by