Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T01:26:33.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is lenition?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Laurie Bauer
Laurie Bauer
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most phonological textbooks and treatises do not define lenition or weakening, as it is also called. Instead they provide a list of examples of processes which they wish to term ‘lenitions’ or ‘weakenings’. It is then hoped that the reader will deduce a correct definition. This is what is done in, for example, Lass & Anderson (1975: 150) and Sommerstein (1977: 228). One of the few available definitions of lenition is to be derived from Vennemann's definition of relative weakness (cited in Hyman, 1975: 165): ‘A segment X is said to be weaker than a segment Y if Y goes through an X stage on its way to zero.’ According to this definition, lenition is primarily a diachronic process affecting the sound structure of languages. It may also have synchronie reflexes (such as initial consonant mutations in the Celtic languages), but these are called ‘lenitions’ by an extension of the term from diachrony.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 381 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, J. (1981). Language change: progress or decay? London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bec, P. (1971). Manuel pratique de philologie romane 2. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (1976). Relative chronology: three methods of reconstruction, JL 12. 209–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escure, G. (1977). Hierarchies and phonological weakening, Lingua 43. 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, R. A. D. (1965). The Chinese language. London: Faber & Faber. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1976). Problems with phonological chains, JL 12. 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagström, B. (1970). A phonetic change in the making: initial /t/ in Faroese pronouns. In Benediktsson, H. (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, Reykjavik: Visindafelag Islendinga, 348–364.Google Scholar
Hirose, H. & Gay, T. (1972). The activity of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles in voicing control. Phonetica 25. 140–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1975). Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & Anderson, J. (1975). Old English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1970). General characteristics of the Germanic languages. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press. Tr. W. P. Oismukes.Google Scholar
Passy, P. (1890). Etude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs charactères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
Prokosch, E. (1939). A comparative Germanie grammar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sawashima, M. & Hirose, H. (1981). Abduction-adduction of the glottis in speech and voice production. In Stevens, K. N. & Hirano, M. (eds), Vocal fold physiology, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 329–346.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1977). Modern phonology. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S-Y. (1967). Phonological features of tone. IJAL 33. 93–105.Google Scholar