Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T19:28:48.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘&’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Philip N. Johnson-Laird
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University College, London W.C.I

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bar-Hillel, Y. (1967). Dictionaries and meaning rules. FL 3. 409414.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C. (1968). Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1967). Katz on analyticity. JL 3. 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1966). The Philosophy of Language. London and New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1967). Recent issues in semantic theory. FL 3. 124194.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Lg. 39. 170210.Google Scholar
Murray, J. A. H. (1888). (ed.) A New English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1954). Dilemmas. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Staal, J. F. (1967a). Word Order in Sanskrit and Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staal, J. F. (1967b). Some semantic relations between sentoids. FL 3. 6688.Google Scholar
Staal, J. F. (1968). ‘And’. JL 4. 7981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar