No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Borja Herce, The typological diversity of morphomes: A cross-linguistic study of unnatural morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. Pp. x + 303.
Review products
Borja Herce, The typological diversity of morphomes: A cross-linguistic study of unnatural morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. Pp. x + 303.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2024
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
REFERENCES
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Bril, Isabelle (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 51–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Hodges, Adam & Rood, David S. (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2016. Thoughts on diagnosing morphomicity: A case study from Ulwa. In Luís, Ana R. & Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (eds.), The morphome debate, 89–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance verb: Morphomic structure and diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2016. A postsyntactic morphome cookbook. In Siddiqi, Daniel & Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 59–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar