Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T00:30:10.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cardinal numbers in French: a study in analogical change1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Marc Picard
Marc Picard
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I. I. In a paper dealing with the analogical elimination of allomorphy and the explanatory (in)adequacy of generative phonology in accounting for it, Hogg hypothesized that ‘a necessary condition for analogical change is that the alternation which is subject to the analogy must not be synchronically rule-governed’ (1979: 58). This observation was elevated to the status of a principle which was formulated as follows:

Analogical extension or levelling of some phonological rule can take place only if that rule is no longer present in the synchronic grammar of the language (Hogg, 1979: 8).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , September 1984 , pp. 205 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, F. (1970). Les règles phonologiques tardives et la morphologie dérivationnelle du français. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dumas, D. (1974). La fusion vocalique en français québécois. Recherches linguistiques à Montréal 2. 23–51.Google Scholar
Dumas, D. (1981). Structure de la diphtongaison québécoise. CJL 26. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. (1979). Analogy and phonology. JL 15. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morin, Y.-C. & Kaye, J. (1982). The syntactic bases for French liaison. JL 18. 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, M. (1977). Canadian raising: the case against reordering. CJL 22. 144–155.Google Scholar
Picard, M. (1979). The syllable boundary in generative phonology. CJL 24. 119–131.Google Scholar
Picard, M. (1980). A constraint on rule complementation. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Pope, M. (1966). From Latin to Modern French. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Schane, S. (1968). French phonology and morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1972). The phrase phonology of English and French. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. (1974). A note on final consonant deletion, the pronunciation of cardinal numbers, and linguistic changes in progress in Modern French. Recherches linguistiques à Montréal 3 173–189.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. (1981). Concreteness in generative phonology: evidence from French. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar