Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:35:25.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

F. R. Palmer (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59. London: Longmans, 1968. Pp. X + 209.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

P. B. Pandit
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Cornell University and Delhi University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bursill-Hall, G. L. (1960). Levels analysis: J. R. Firth's theories of linguistic analysis. Journal of the Canadian Linguistics Association 6. 124135, 164191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–51. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. & Pike, K. L. (1949). Co-existent phonemic systems. Lg. 25. 2950.Google Scholar
Langendoen, T. (1964). Review of Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Lg. 40. 305321.Google Scholar
Langendoen, T. (1968). The London School of Linguistics – A Study of the Linguistic Theories of B. Malinowski and J. R. Firth. Research Monograph no. 46. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (ed.) (1958). Readings in Linguistics. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1947). Grammatical prerequisites to phonemic analysis. Word 3. 155172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1952). More on grammatical prerequisites. Word. 8. 106121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prator, C. H. (1968). The British heresy in TESL. In Fishman, J., Ferguson, C. & Gupta, J. D., Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley. 459476.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1959). Review of Studies in Linguistic Analysis. IJAL 25. 254–59.Google Scholar