No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Frank Heny & Barry Richards (eds), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles. Volume One: Categories. Volume Two: The scope, order and distribution of English auxiliary verbs. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983. Vol. One, pp. viii + 294; Vol. Two, v + 258.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985
References
REFERENCES
Akmajian, A., Steele, S. & Wasow, T. (1979). The category AUX in universal grammar. LIn 10. 1–64.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. (1981). Learnability and the English auxiliary system. In Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J. (eds), The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 296–323.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., Pullum, G. & Sag, I. (1982). Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar. Lg 58. 591–638.Google Scholar
Ghinina, St., Nikolova, T. & Sakazova, L. (1972). A Bulgarian text book for foreigners. Sofia: Naouko Izkoustvo.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Thomason, R. H. (ed.), Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press. 247–270.Google Scholar
Perkins, M. R. (1982). The core meanings of the English modals. JL 18. 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. (1982). Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to. Glossa 16. 181–215.Google Scholar
Steele, S., Akmajian, A., Demers, R., Jelinek, E., Kitagawa, C., Oehrle, R. & Wasow, T. (1981). An encyclopedia of AUX: a study in cross-linguistic equivalence. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 5. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar