Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T10:18:57.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

María J. Arche, Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 94). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006. Pp. xiii+281.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2008

Paula Menéndez-Benito
Paula Menéndez-Benito*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
*
Author's address:Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, 226 South College, 150 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA 01003-9274, U.S.A.paulamb@linguist.umass.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 514 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Carlson, N. Gregory & Jeffry Pelletier, Francis(eds.) 1995. The generic book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In Carlson, & Pelletier, (eds.) 176–223.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1984. Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. In Pieter, Muysken & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.) Features and projections, 233–254. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard. 2001. Topic-comment structure and the contrast between stage level and individual level predicates. Journal of Semantics 18.2, 83–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Carlson, & Pelletier, (eds.) 125–175.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 26, 385–399.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2004. A pragmatic explanation of the stage level/individual level contrast in combination with locatives. Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 15, 158–170.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005a. A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar. Linguistics 43.1, 155–180.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005b. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31.3, 275–316.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3.1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Musan, Renate. 1995. On the temporal interpretation of noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1981. The origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1993. Syntax of tense. Ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1996. The phrase structure of tense. In Johan, Rooryck & Laurie, Zaring (eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon, 211–291. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar