Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T16:52:01.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On dropping the single mother condition: notes on split controllers, split antecedents and antecedent-contained pro-forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Sakio Saito
Affiliation:
Meiji gakuin University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouton, L. (1970). Antecedent-contained pro-forms. PCLS 6. 154167.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edes, E. (MS). Output conditions on anaphoric expressions with split antecedents. Mimeograph, 1968.Google Scholar
Grinder, J. T. (1970). On deletion phenomena (Doctoral dissertation). La Jolla: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. & Ross, J. R. (1970). Relative clauses with split antecedents. LIn I. 530.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1970). On coreferential complement subject deletion. LIn I. 439500.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1975). The single mother condition. JL II. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar