Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T09:17:19.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On whimperatives and related questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Anders Holmberg
Affiliation:
Faculté des Lettres, Université de Mohammed I, Oujda, Morocco

Extract

In a number of works up to 1974 Jerrold Sadock advanced and defended the claim that there are a limited but distinct number of sentence structures in English which exhibit true illocutionary ambiguity. Structure (1) belongs to this limited number.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fraser, B. (1973). On accounting for illocutionary forces. In Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (forthcoming). Review of J. J. Katz, Journal of Literary Semantics.Google Scholar
Green, G. (1975). How to get people to do things with words. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 107141.Google Scholar
Harnish, R. (1977). Logical form and implicature. In Bever, T. G., Katz, J. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds), An integrated theory of linguistic ability. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press. 313395.Google Scholar
Harnish, R. (1978). Review of Sadock, 1974. Lingua 44. 288301.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (1977). Om indirekte direktiver. Nysvenska Studier 57. 137149.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (1970). Two approaches to the analysis of tags. JL 6. 215222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (1975). The meaning of questions. Lg 51. 131.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1977). Propositional structure and illocutionary force. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1974). Syntactic amalgams. PCLS 10. 321344.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, Minding your P's and Q's. PCLS 9. 292305.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, A. (1976). Grammar and illocutionary force. Lingua 40. 2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol 9: Pragmatics New York: Academic Press. 261279.Google Scholar
Pope, E. (1976). Questions and answers in English. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. (1972). Speech act idioms. PCLS 8. 329339.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. (1974) Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. & Zwicky, A. (forthcoming) Sentence types. In Anderson, S. et al. (eds), Language typology and syntactic fieldwork.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1975a). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 5982.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1975b). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 7: Language, mind, and knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (forthcoming). Pragmatics and rhetoric: the interpretation of utterances.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R., Schachter, P. & Partee, B. H. (1973). The major syntactic structures in English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (forthcoming). Ordered entailments: an alternative to presuppositional theories. In Dinneen, C. & D. (eds), Syntax and semantics, vol. II: Presuppositions.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. & Sadock, J. (1975). Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. In Kimball, J. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol.4: New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar